2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of combination therapy using BRAF and MEK inhibitors among Asian patients with advanced melanoma: An analysis of 112 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the minority of metastatic MM patients who harbour BRAF mutations, combined inhibition of BRAF and MEK may represent a valid therapeutic opportunity, as this combination therapy already showed an impressive response rate and survival benefit in BRAFV600E/K positive cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients [142]. Indeed, a Japanese retrospective study evaluating BRAF and MEK inhibition also in MM with BRAF mutations reported similar response rates of those achieved for CM (64.3% vs. 76.5%) patients [143]. Furthermore, for patients with NRAS, NF1 or SPRED1 alterations, a potential therapeutic strategy may be represented by targeting the downstream protein MEK.…”
Section: Targeted Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the minority of metastatic MM patients who harbour BRAF mutations, combined inhibition of BRAF and MEK may represent a valid therapeutic opportunity, as this combination therapy already showed an impressive response rate and survival benefit in BRAFV600E/K positive cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients [142]. Indeed, a Japanese retrospective study evaluating BRAF and MEK inhibition also in MM with BRAF mutations reported similar response rates of those achieved for CM (64.3% vs. 76.5%) patients [143]. Furthermore, for patients with NRAS, NF1 or SPRED1 alterations, a potential therapeutic strategy may be represented by targeting the downstream protein MEK.…”
Section: Targeted Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, drug resistance is easily developed, especially in Asian population. 8,9 There is an unmet need for effective therapy in patients with progressive melanoma, especially those resistant to BRAF inhibitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E + B combination therapy is one of the first-line therapies for advanced melanoma that is recommended by several guidelines for cutaneous melanoma [ 1 , 2 ], and it is known to develop a different profile of AEs compared with dabrafenib plus trametinib (D + T) combination therapy [ 3 , 6 ]. For example, one of the characteristic AEs of E + B combination therapy is serous retinal detachment [ 3 , 4 , 5 ], whereas a characteristic AE of D + T combination therapy is pyrexia [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. However, a case of tubulointerstitial nephritis as an AE of E + B combination therapy was limited in all of these clinical studies [ 3 , 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%