2002
DOI: 10.1177/152660280200900201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of Conservative versus Interventional Treatment of Subclavian Artery Stenosis

Abstract: Endovascular revascularization improves the long-term hemodynamic outcome in patients with subclavian stenosis, but many conservatively treated patients become asymptomatic during follow-up. Interventional treatment may be considered primarily for patients with severe symptoms of vertebrobasilar insufficiency, critical ischemia, or peripheral emboli.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shillinger et al, Staikov et al and de Vries et al in their studies showed that the subclavian obstructive lesions are mostly located in the proximal segment of the subclavian artery, proximal to the origin of the vertebral artery and predominantly on the left side [11,15,16]. Because the left subclavian artery has a more prominent angle at its origin, it is likely that turbulent flow patterns in the aortic arch and at the origin of the subclavian artery are responsible for extensive plaque formation at this particular location accelerating atherosclerosis [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Shillinger et al, Staikov et al and de Vries et al in their studies showed that the subclavian obstructive lesions are mostly located in the proximal segment of the subclavian artery, proximal to the origin of the vertebral artery and predominantly on the left side [11,15,16]. Because the left subclavian artery has a more prominent angle at its origin, it is likely that turbulent flow patterns in the aortic arch and at the origin of the subclavian artery are responsible for extensive plaque formation at this particular location accelerating atherosclerosis [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The presented results differ only slightly from the results of endovascular methods of treating simple arterial constrictions, and in addition yield better longterm results (1,16). For instance, in the paper by Schillinger et al (17), covering 107 subjects with previous endovascular interventions on the subclavian artery, the patency rate after 1 year, 3 and 4 years remained, respectively, on the level of 91%, 83%, 79%. In our own study, the primary patency in the follow-up period after 1 year, 3 and 5 years was 68% for SCB and 100% for SCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a retrospective study evaluating outcomes in 274 patients treated with either a conservative (n = 165) or invasive (n = 109) approach for subclavian artery atherosclerotic disease with a median follow-up of 42 months, patients treated with PTA had a 60% risk reduction for the development of a hemodynamically signifi cant stenosis (P < 0.01), defi ned as an upperextremity blood pressure diff erential of ≥20 mm Hg compared with conservative treatment (7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%