2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of culture-negative pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: Comparison with microbiologically confirmed pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
54
5
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
54
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, the recent study by Kim et al showed a more favorable outcome in empirical treated patient versus patients with microbiologically confirmed spondylodiscitis. Kim et al suggest that the patients with culture negative spondylodiscitis often have a less severe infection and therefore a more better outcome [59]. In our review, no difference in outcome is seen between the studies with a low percentage of positive cultures versus studies with a high percentage.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, the recent study by Kim et al showed a more favorable outcome in empirical treated patient versus patients with microbiologically confirmed spondylodiscitis. Kim et al suggest that the patients with culture negative spondylodiscitis often have a less severe infection and therefore a more better outcome [59]. In our review, no difference in outcome is seen between the studies with a low percentage of positive cultures versus studies with a high percentage.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…The percentage of positive cultures ranges from 42-100 % in the current review. The assumption that identification of the causative microorganism leads to more effective treatment is well established; however, there are no studies available to support this hypothesis [2,9,59]. On the contrary, the recent study by Kim et al showed a more favorable outcome in empirical treated patient versus patients with microbiologically confirmed spondylodiscitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, various reports have shown that the treatment duration, mortality, and recurrence rate do not seem to differ between the patients with identification of the causative organism and those without46,63,89,96). Similarly, the data from the authors’ institute also show that the yield of a second biopsy in patients with negative results from a first fluoroscopy-guided biopsy was only 7.6%(2 out of 26 patients)45).…”
Section: Identification Of Causative Organismsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Moreover, the present study found no significant difference in outcome between biopsy culture-positive and culture-negative patients. A recent study by Kim et al [15] reported no significant difference ( P  = 0.157) in treatment success (defined as survival and absence of signs of infection at the end of the therapy) either between 75 patients with microbiologically confirmed spondylodiscitis (whether by means of blood or biopsy cultures) and 76 patients without microbiologically confirmed spondylodiscitis. Given the above-mentioned numbers, and the fact that (despite being relatively safe, with transient complications in 2% [16]) CT-guided biopsy is costly, invasive, and uses potentially harmful ionizing radiation, the idea has been coined to manage patients without clinical findings suspicious for “atypical” pathogens with a course of empirical antibiotic therapy, without performing CT-guided biopsy [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%