2009
DOI: 10.3113/fai.2009.0106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of Fusion of a Painful Accessory Navicular to the Primary Navicular

Abstract: When conservative treatment fails to relieve pain in a type II accessory navicular, fusion of the accessory navicular to the navicular may successfully relieve pain without disrupting the tibialis posterior tendon insertion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, screw osteosynthesis of an accessory navicular which is large enough to accept small screws achieved bone union in 80 to 82%. 5,15 According to Scott et al, in 30% of feet treated with a modified Kinder procedure, there was radiographic evidence of progressive longitudinal arch loss, while AOFAS scores were found to improve from 52 to 80 compared with improvement from 50 to 93 in fusion cases at a mean followup of 48 months. 15 However, for screw fixation or percutaneous drilling, the diameter of the accessory navicular should be at least 2 to 3 times wider than the screw or drill bit necessary for the procedure, 5,1514 and these procedures have the risk of accessory navicular fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, screw osteosynthesis of an accessory navicular which is large enough to accept small screws achieved bone union in 80 to 82%. 5,15 According to Scott et al, in 30% of feet treated with a modified Kinder procedure, there was radiographic evidence of progressive longitudinal arch loss, while AOFAS scores were found to improve from 52 to 80 compared with improvement from 50 to 93 in fusion cases at a mean followup of 48 months. 15 However, for screw fixation or percutaneous drilling, the diameter of the accessory navicular should be at least 2 to 3 times wider than the screw or drill bit necessary for the procedure, 5,1514 and these procedures have the risk of accessory navicular fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Patients who fail nonoperative measures should be considered for operative intervention. Accepted surgical treatments for such patients include simple excision of the accessory bone from within the PTT, screw fixation of the accessory bone to the native navicular, 7,8 or excision with detachment, advancement and reattachment of the PTT, also known as the Kidner procedure. 1,[5][6][7][9][10][11] The Kidner procedure was first described in 1929 by Dr Frederick Clinton Kidner and has had great success in alleviating pain in patients with a symptomatic accessory navicular recalcitrant to nonoperative treatments.…”
Section: Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accepted surgical treatments for such patients include simple excision of the accessory bone from within the PTT, screw fixation of the accessory bone to the native navicular, 7,8 or excision with detachment, advancement and reattachment of the PTT, also known as the Kidner procedure. 1,[5][6][7][9][10][11] The Kidner procedure was first described in 1929 by Dr Frederick Clinton Kidner and has had great success in alleviating pain in patients with a symptomatic accessory navicular recalcitrant to nonoperative treatments. 5,9,10,12 However, it has been shown that the Kidner procedure alone fails to correct the flattening of the arch, except in very young children where correction was attributed to growth rather than the procedure itself.…”
Section: Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26] Arthrodesis of an accessory navicular to the main body of the navicular has also been described in larger ossicles using one or two cannulated screws. [27][28][29]…”
Section: Complications Of Fdl Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have assessed arthrodesis of a type 2 accessory navicular to the medial process of the navicular. [27][28][29] The most common significant complication is nonunion/loosening of screws, requiring further surgery to excise the ossicle. 28,29 Chung et al reported that 6 of 22 feet had loosening of the screw(s).…”
Section: Complications Of the Modified Kidner Procedures And Arthrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%