1996
DOI: 10.1080/026990596124061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of intensive rehabilitation after severe brain injury: a long-term follow-up study

Abstract: Fifty-five brain-injured adults (of 64 discharged) were followed up from 19 to 101 months after discharge from a rehabilitation unit. Change was assessed in terms of discharge and current placement, as compared with pre-admission placement. The results demonstrate that rehabilitation achieved improvements in functional skills and social behaviour that lastingly affected the type of placement possible, and thus improved quality of life. In most cases where improvements were seen during rehabilitation, further i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eames et al [40] later reported similar outcomes with another cohort of severely disturbed individuals, demonstrating that improved social functioning could result in changes in accommodation status when assessed an average of 5 years post-discharge. Interestingly, amongst this group of 64 patients, only 26 were considered to have completed their rehabilitation by their date of discharge and 17 had funding withdrawn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eames et al [40] later reported similar outcomes with another cohort of severely disturbed individuals, demonstrating that improved social functioning could result in changes in accommodation status when assessed an average of 5 years post-discharge. Interestingly, amongst this group of 64 patients, only 26 were considered to have completed their rehabilitation by their date of discharge and 17 had funding withdrawn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In contrast to earlier research [40][41][42] the intention was to undertake a prospective study, collecting data as people progressed through their rehabilitation and after discharge. This included observations of psychological, functional and behavioural characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some evidence suggesting that changes continue to occur more than 10 years after severe brain injury in the absence of intervention, sometimes for the better (McMillan & Herbert, 2004;Sbordone et al, 1995) and sometimes for the worse (Thomsen, 1992). Eames, Cotterill, Kneale, Storrar, and Yeomans (1995) describe a case where a patient admitted 13 years after injury made significant physical and functional gains during 7 months of rehabilitation. Wood, McCrea, Wood, and Merriman (1999) found that neurobehavioural rehabilitation still produced positive changes in patients more than 5 years post-injury although the changes were not as great as for those receiving rehabilitation sooner after injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Rehabilitation services for TBI increase, but few data exist with respect to the long-term cognitive performance in a paediatric rehabilitation population. Most studies investigated functional outcome after rehabilitation in an adult TBI population [20][21][22][23][24]. The few studies that were performed in children who received rehabilitation had broad inclusion criteria [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%