2016
DOI: 10.3109/08039488.2016.1160149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of patients with dual diagnosis in secondary psychiatric care

Abstract: Given our results suggesting a stable level of functioning, patients with DD appear to be well managed within secondary psychiatric care. Attention should be paid to more precise diagnostics of SUDs and to effective use of medication.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Retention in the treatment network is the cornerstone of improvement in individuals with DD. [80818283] (3) At the end of 6 months, despite similar dropout rates in both groups, there was a significant difference noted in the outcome of psychiatric illness and SUD, i.e., EOS group had better outcome in both psychiatric illness and SUD as compared to the LOS group. This can be because that there was more number of subjects with psychotic disorders or cannabis-induced psychotic disorders in the EOS group and keeping them in the treatment net could have possibly led to better outcome in the EOS group with regard to more number of participants with affective disorders in the LOS group which possibly be having an episodic course with periodic relapses leading to more number of unchanged outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retention in the treatment network is the cornerstone of improvement in individuals with DD. [80818283] (3) At the end of 6 months, despite similar dropout rates in both groups, there was a significant difference noted in the outcome of psychiatric illness and SUD, i.e., EOS group had better outcome in both psychiatric illness and SUD as compared to the LOS group. This can be because that there was more number of subjects with psychotic disorders or cannabis-induced psychotic disorders in the EOS group and keeping them in the treatment net could have possibly led to better outcome in the EOS group with regard to more number of participants with affective disorders in the LOS group which possibly be having an episodic course with periodic relapses leading to more number of unchanged outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ODS intervention group, the baseline assessment was based on the Cube Method which is an integrated assessment method for comorbid psychiatric and substance use disorders in clinical settings; the method was developed by Kampman and Lassila in the South Ostrobothnia hospital district [ 20 , 21 ]. Systematic assessment helps to target suitable treatment for each patient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherence to antidepressants was monitored during the first six weeks of the study using a paper and pencil diary (for more information see [16]). [36,37]. In the present study setting the aim was to identify individuals with marked alcohol use problems with high specificity to obtain motivational interview as an add-on psychosocial treatment.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%