2020
DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1824069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with polatuzumab vedotin-based therapy: real-life experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
26
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
26
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These patients were excluded from the approval study. A similar trend of a worse outcome in a real-world study of pola was reported by Segman et al 22 Although outcomes in real-world settings may not be as promising as demonstrated in the approval study, pola still may have a valuable role to play in LBCL salvage therapy, even in patients following several failed treatment lines. Despite the adverse baseline characteristics, the moderate toxicity profile of pola was confirmed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…These patients were excluded from the approval study. A similar trend of a worse outcome in a real-world study of pola was reported by Segman et al 22 Although outcomes in real-world settings may not be as promising as demonstrated in the approval study, pola still may have a valuable role to play in LBCL salvage therapy, even in patients following several failed treatment lines. Despite the adverse baseline characteristics, the moderate toxicity profile of pola was confirmed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Treatment was generally well tolerated, and the safety profile was similar to those reported by others as were the ORR (61%) and complete response rate (CR) (40%). Interestingly, the ORR in patients receiving P-B ± R was comparable to those who received P-R (62.5% vs 60%) [107] and mirrored those reported for the Romulus trial. These results support the positive clinical benefit of Polivy and have prompted the expanded testing of combinations of this ADC with other drugs and for other CD79b+ HMs are also being tested.…”
Section: Clinical Efficacysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Only two (3.3%) patients of the present cohort had received only 1 previous treatment line versus 27.5% in the GO29365 study and by definition none in the Israeli series 34 ,. 40 At Pola‐BR initiation 40% of our patients had PS ≥ 2 versus 15% in the GO29365 trial and 53% in the Israeli cohort. Our cohort included also 14 (25%) patients with PS 3–4, an exclusion criterion for the GO29365 trial, while the Israeli cohort included such patients without reporting precise numbers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The vast majority of our patients had DLBCL and 49 DLBCL patients received Pola‐BR, being eligible for efficacy analysis. The recently published Israeli real‐life experience with Pola‐BR included 31 rrDLBCL patients, with 23 receiving Pola‐BR 40 . Compared to the GO29365 study and the Israeli cohort, our patients were slightly younger with a median age of 63 years versus 67 and 66.4 years respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%