2018
DOI: 10.4103/1319-2442.225198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of renal transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus and BK polyomavirus co-infection nephropathy

Abstract: Reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and BK polyomavirus (BKV) can result in virus-associated tubulointerstitial nephritis in renal allografts. All those renal biopsies reported as viral cytopathic were isolated and examined by two independent renal histopathologists from our institute and classified as CMV, BKV, and CMV-BKV coinfection-associated viral cytopathic changes with confirmation through polymerase chain reaction technology in either serum or urine or both. All twenty patients were categorized as 10… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for these observations could be that, for example, the absolute number of invasive infections such as BK nephropathy in our center is < 10% of patients with BKPyV DNAemia 21 , 30 . Nevertheless, in agreement with Blazquez-Navarro and Kaul et al we observed that patients with co-infections had a worse renal graft function compared to non-infected or single virus infected patients 12 , 35 . Ultimately, we cannot know for certain whether the reduced graft function of patients with co-infection results from the co-infection itself or is biased by the more frequent occurrence of rejection episodes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A possible explanation for these observations could be that, for example, the absolute number of invasive infections such as BK nephropathy in our center is < 10% of patients with BKPyV DNAemia 21 , 30 . Nevertheless, in agreement with Blazquez-Navarro and Kaul et al we observed that patients with co-infections had a worse renal graft function compared to non-infected or single virus infected patients 12 , 35 . Ultimately, we cannot know for certain whether the reduced graft function of patients with co-infection results from the co-infection itself or is biased by the more frequent occurrence of rejection episodes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In line with the data, Kaul et al found in an analysis of tissue-invasive CMV-BKPyV co-infections in renal transplants biopsies that coinfected grafts had an inferior function. Interestingly, coinfection had no effect on patient and graft survival 35 . This is somehow surprising since an impact on allograft survival has been reported previously for single virus infections by others 15 , 36 , 37 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“… 1 Only small retrospective case series have reported outcomes of patients infected with both viruses. 2 , 3 Jehn et al 2 compared the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients presenting with concomitant BKPyV and CMV viremia ( n =59), CMV viremia alone ( n =182), and BKPyV viremia alone ( n =102). They found a strong association between coinfection and occurrence of acute rejection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biopsy-proven rejection was higher in patients with CMV/BKV coinfection compared with those with mono-infection (59.3% coinfection vs. 44.1% BKV+, 41.5% CMV+) [16 ▪▪ ]. Long-term graft and patient survival were not significantly affected, though follow-up varied between studies [14,15,16 ▪▪ ]. Studies reporting outcomes are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BKV and EBV have also been implicated [9][10][11][12][13]. Incidence rates up to 42% have been reported for at least two viruses [9][10][11][12]14,15].…”
Section: Renal Transplantmentioning
confidence: 99%