2016
DOI: 10.1080/2000656x.2016.1210520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of simple decompression of the compressed ulnar nerve at the elbow – influence of smoking, gender, and electrophysiological findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other relevant studies have populations with an age distribution similar to that in our study, with a mean age of around 50 years [14,[18][19][20][21]. Adelaar et al found no relationship between age and the postoperative result, while Leone et al stated that the result of primary anterior intramuscular transposition is less good in patients younger than 50 years [15,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Other relevant studies have populations with an age distribution similar to that in our study, with a mean age of around 50 years [14,[18][19][20][21]. Adelaar et al found no relationship between age and the postoperative result, while Leone et al stated that the result of primary anterior intramuscular transposition is less good in patients younger than 50 years [15,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Smoking has been associated with a worse outcome and a risk of developing chronic pain after surgical procedures in several studies, 36 while other studies state that smoking does not affect outcome after surgery. 7 , 37 , 38 In the present study, a high proportion of the patients were smokers. Our previous study indicated that smoking doubled the risk of complications after surgery for ulnar nerve compression, with pain after surgery being the most common complication.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 41%
“…This type of simple clinical outcome assessment by the treating surgeon has been shown to correlate well to improvement in the patient-rated outcome questionnaire QuickDASH at one year post-surgery [19]. The QuickDASH is suitable for evaluation of outcome in clinical studies [19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the retrospective nature of the study postoperative outcome based on validated, standardized questionnaires could not be re- produced. The outcomes were, therefore, based on patient-reported and surgeon-evaluated outcome registered in the patient files at the last out-patient visit and then divided into two groups for comparison and due to clinical reasons: cured/improved or unchanged/worsened [19]. During the study's timeframe, there were no standardized follow-up at our department, but it was done according to the decision of the treating surgeon.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation