2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome of unrelated transplants in patients with multiple myeloma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Myeloablative allogeneic HCT has been shown to be an effective treatment for MM, but high transplantrelated mortality (TRM) remains a concern [2][3][4]. A graft-versus-myeloma effect has been demonstrated [5,6], but poor results have been reported for allogeneic HCT using unrelated donors [7]. Allogeneic HCT with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens may be preferable in the treatment of older and heavily pretreated patients due to an observed lower TRM compared with myeloablative HCT, but has a higher risk of relapse and disease progression [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myeloablative allogeneic HCT has been shown to be an effective treatment for MM, but high transplantrelated mortality (TRM) remains a concern [2][3][4]. A graft-versus-myeloma effect has been demonstrated [5,6], but poor results have been reported for allogeneic HCT using unrelated donors [7]. Allogeneic HCT with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens may be preferable in the treatment of older and heavily pretreated patients due to an observed lower TRM compared with myeloablative HCT, but has a higher risk of relapse and disease progression [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ballen et al [29] reviewed unrelated donor myeloablative allo-SCT in 70 patients with myeloma whose transplantations were facilitated by the National Marrow Donor Program between 1989 and 2000. Most of the patients (64%) received a TBI-based conditioning regimen, and 39% received a T-cell-depleted graft.…”
Section: Conventional Allo-sct In Myelomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5-year PFS and OS was only 7 and 9%, respectively, due to a high day-100 mortality of 42% and a cumulative incidence of relapse of 34% at 3 years. The major causes of death were infectious complications (50%), toxicity (19%), and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (16%) [24]. The Seattle group reported on 14 patients who received allogeneic SCT from unrelated or mismatched related donors after myeloablative conditioning.…”
Section: Unrelated Stem Cell Transplantation After Myeloablative Condmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ballen et al [24] analyzed 71 patients who received a myeloablative conditioning regimen followed by allogeneic SCT from an unrelated donor facilitated by the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP). The median age was 44 years, and 31% had received preceding autologous SCT.…”
Section: Unrelated Stem Cell Transplantation After Myeloablative Condmentioning
confidence: 99%