2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01453-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcome prediction in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a comparison of machine learning methods and established clinico-radiological scores

Abstract: Reliable prediction of outcomes of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) based on factors available at patient admission may support responsible allocation of resources as well as treatment decisions. Radiographic and clinical scoring systems may help clinicians estimate disease severity, but their predictive value is limited, especially in devising treatment strategies. In this study, we aimed to examine whether a machine learning (ML) approach using variables available on admission may improve outcome pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A study conducted by Nora Franziska Dengler in 2020 showed that machine learning algorithms including CatBoost tree boosting, support vector machine classifier, Naive Bayes classifier and multilayer perceptron artificial neural net was comparable but not superior to traditional logistic regression in predicting outcome of aSAH patients. 21 And the predictive value of these algorithms was not superior than previously developed clinical-radiographic scores such as Hunt-Huss, WFNS, mFisher and Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) Score. However, this study only included basic clinical and radiographic features and did not collect intracranial complications and other biochemical parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A study conducted by Nora Franziska Dengler in 2020 showed that machine learning algorithms including CatBoost tree boosting, support vector machine classifier, Naive Bayes classifier and multilayer perceptron artificial neural net was comparable but not superior to traditional logistic regression in predicting outcome of aSAH patients. 21 And the predictive value of these algorithms was not superior than previously developed clinical-radiographic scores such as Hunt-Huss, WFNS, mFisher and Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) Score. However, this study only included basic clinical and radiographic features and did not collect intracranial complications and other biochemical parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Different from previous prognostic models for patients after aSAH with small sample sizes, [18][19][20][21] our study used a clinically homogeneous group of patients with a large sample size. For example, Hostettler et al 22 used a decision tree to predict the long-term outcome for the patients after aSAH (n = 329) using both clinical information and laboratory measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of strokes, machine learning algorithms have already been used in clinical applications for automatic diagnosis. ML methods have been applied to the diagnosis of a stroke [ 20 ], prediction of stroke symptom onset [ 21 , 22 ], assessment of stroke severity [ 23 ], analysis of cerebral edema [ 24 ], and outcome prediction [ 25 ]. The data used in these studies were composed of medical records, CT images, or MRI scans.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%