1997
DOI: 10.1080/17453674.1997.11744711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes after multi-modality treatment of musculoskeletal tumours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In half of the long‐term osteosarcoma survivor studies that we reviewed for this study, the authors reported on functional 21, 22 or psychosocial 6, 18, 23–26 outcomes. Of the remaining outcome studies reviewed, in which investigators assessed both functional and psychosocial outcomes 5, 17, 27–32, only one study compared a psychosocial variable with physical function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In half of the long‐term osteosarcoma survivor studies that we reviewed for this study, the authors reported on functional 21, 22 or psychosocial 6, 18, 23–26 outcomes. Of the remaining outcome studies reviewed, in which investigators assessed both functional and psychosocial outcomes 5, 17, 27–32, only one study compared a psychosocial variable with physical function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations on smaller numbers of patients from elsewhere in the United States,45 from Australia,46 and from the Netherlands47 reveal no significant differences in psychological outcomes and HRQoL between amputees and those who have undergone limb salvage. There are 2 additional perspectives that are worthy of consideration in evaluating such information: patients who proceed to amputation are seldom candidates for limb‐sparing surgery,46 and patients who have amputations for cancer may fare much better than traumatic amputees in terms of adaptation to disability 48. In this latter regard, a study of >500 patients who had experienced leg‐threatening injuries, from a consortium of 8 level 1 trauma centers in the United States, revealed that the HRQoL was no different in those who had reconstructive (limb‐salvage) surgery and those who had amputations 49.…”
Section: The Challengementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Improved function and quality of life have been attributed to limb salvage but have not been universally demonstrated in the adult population [33]. A number of studies document better physical function in patients with limb salvage compared to patients with amputation [1,10,15,22,24,32,38,39]. Other studies have reported no difference in function with limb salvage [4,21,23], but a higher quality of life with limb salvage [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigation performed at Moffitt Cancer Center and All Children's Hospital (St Petersburg, FL). quality of life with limb salvage has been reported due to less social alienation and increased self-esteem compared to amputations [20,24,30]. In contrast, some authors report equivalent quality of life in limb salvage and amputation patients [22,23,26,34,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%