2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3018(15)00021-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes after viral load rebound on first-line antiretroviral treatment in children with HIV in the UK and Ireland: an observational cohort study

Abstract: Background-Approximately one-third of HIV-infected children experience virological failure within two years of initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART). We determined the probability of switch to second-line ART or viral load (VL) re-suppression without switch among children who experienced VL rebound on first-line ART in an observational cohort in the UK/Ireland.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
3
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another South African study showed a higher VR rate at a plasma VL threshold >400 copies/ml among younger adolescents (aged 10-14 years; 6.3 per 100 PYFU) compared with older adolescents (aged 15-19 years; 3.8 per 100 PYFU) on first-line cART [24]. Additionally, we found that our cumulative incidence of post-suppression VR was lower than a 19% incidence demonstrated in the Collaborative HIV Paediatric Study (CHIPS; using the definition of VR as a plasma VL >400 copies/ml), which was conducted in antiretroviral-naïve children and adolescents receiving first-line regimens, over a median duration of 1.8 years after treatment initiation in the UK and Ireland [12]. These results emphasize that although adolescents may have a childhood history of viral suppression, they remain at risk of developing VR later in life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another South African study showed a higher VR rate at a plasma VL threshold >400 copies/ml among younger adolescents (aged 10-14 years; 6.3 per 100 PYFU) compared with older adolescents (aged 15-19 years; 3.8 per 100 PYFU) on first-line cART [24]. Additionally, we found that our cumulative incidence of post-suppression VR was lower than a 19% incidence demonstrated in the Collaborative HIV Paediatric Study (CHIPS; using the definition of VR as a plasma VL >400 copies/ml), which was conducted in antiretroviral-naïve children and adolescents receiving first-line regimens, over a median duration of 1.8 years after treatment initiation in the UK and Ireland [12]. These results emphasize that although adolescents may have a childhood history of viral suppression, they remain at risk of developing VR later in life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virologic rebound (VR) after suppression on cART has been reported in perinatally HIV-infected youth (cumulative incidence: 19%) and adults (cumulative incidence: 6-42%), using the definition of plasma viral load (VL) >400 copies/ml [12-15]. A study comparing the risk of VR between non-perinatally HIV-infected adolescents and adults found that adolescents had a significantly greater incidence than adults (6 months after initial suppression: cumulative incidence 31% vs. 17%; P = 0.02; and 12 months after initial suppression: cumulative incidence 42% vs. 20%; P = 0.004) [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation of constant one-off rate of VF emphasizes the need of strengthening education and adherence counseling in HIV infected children at each contact, as almost 1 child in 5 was exposed to permanent VF in our centre. We are tempted to attribute our results to the routine practice of therapeutic education, anticipating that it may have helped achieving such low rate of VF in routine care settings [13] [17] [18]. Unfortunately in this report, we were limited to analyze the impact of therapeutic education on viral suppression, due to poor data collection of our process of adherence counseling, which was done at many points of care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses to first‐line ART among children have been evaluated in large randomized trials and observational studies [4‐12]. Studies evaluating outcomes on second‐line ART in children; however, have been limited by small sample sizes in both resource‐rich and resource‐limited settings [6,13‐21]. Of the four published studies on second‐line ART with larger sample sizes, ranging from 111 to 277 children, three were conducted in Thailand or the Asia‐Pacific region [18‐20], and one followed Ugandan children who were switched to a lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)‐based second‐line regimen [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%