Outcomes and indications for emergency thoracotomy after adoption of a more liberal policy in a western European level 1 trauma centre: 8-year experience

Abstract

The role of emergency thoracotomy (ET) in blunt trauma is still a matter of debate and in Europe only a small number of studies have been published. We report our experience about ET both in penetrating and blunt trauma, discussing indications, outcomes and proposing an algorithm for patient selection. We retrospectively analysed patients who underwent ET at Maggiore Hospital Trauma Center over two periods: from January 1st, 2010 to December 31st, 2012, and from January 1st, 2013 to May 31st, 2017. Demographic and clinical data, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, site of injury, time of witnessed cardiac arrest, presence/absence of signs of life, length of stay were considered, as well as survival rate and neurological outcome. 27 ETs were performed: 21 after blunt trauma and 6 after penetrating trauma. Motor vehicle accident was the main mechanism of injury, followed by fall from height. The mean age was 40.5 years and the median Injury Severity Score was of 40. The most frequent injury was cardiac tamponade. The overall survival rate was 10% during the first period and 23.5% during the second period, after the adoption of a more liberal policy. No long-term neurological sequelae were reported. The outcomes of ET in trauma patient, either after penetrating or blunt trauma, are poor but not negligible. To date, only small series of ET from European trauma centres have been published, although larger series are available from USA and South Africa. However, in selected patients, all efforts must be made for the patient’s survival; the possibility of organ donation should be taken into consideration as well. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s13304-018-0607-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Validation of a Novel Clinical Criteria to Predict Candidacy for Aortic Occlusion: An Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Study

“…However, it has been repeatedly shown that RT can be significantly morbid and is resource intensive. [1][2][3] With recent advances and enthusiasm in endovascular interventions to control NCTH, an increasing number of research studies, mainly in a retrospective manner, have examined the use of the resuscitative endovascular occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for severely injured patients as an alternative method of AO. [4][5][6] To date, multiple studies in Japan and the United States using the nationwide database have failed to demonstrate outcome benefits related to the use of REBOA.…”

A national study of emergency thoracotomy for trauma

“…[ 5 ] Similarly, western Europe has also seen a greater proportion of EDTs performed for blunt trauma. [ 14 ] We did not have the ability to identify if EDT was performed for nontraumatic injuries, as EDT is becoming expanded to other conditions. [ 15 ]…”

An Early Experience of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) in the Republic of Korea: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

“…Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been developed to control hemodynamically unstable hemorrhagic shock patients and to maintain brain and coronary perfusion [4,5]. Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy (ERT), which was previously performed, can be indicated for a single penetrating injury; however, for blunt injuries, there are many debates on performing ERT [6]. Some authors argue that REBOA can replace ERT in select cases [4,7].…”