2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-01798-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes and limitations of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy in malignant biliary obstruction

Abstract: Background Transpapillary biliary drainage in ERCP is an established method for symptomatic treatment of patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage frequently remains the treatment of choice when the transpapillary approach proves ineffective. Recently, EUS-guided extra-anatomical anastomoses of bile ducts to the gastrointestinal tract have been reported as an alternative to percutaneous biliary drainage. To assess the usefulness of extr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16,17 EHG has recently been described as an effective and alternative method to percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) in unresectable malignant biliary obstruction in case of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failure. 18 Technical success rate of this technique has been described to be as high as 98% and common adverse events are most commonly bleeding (4.03%), bile leakage (4.03%), stent migration (2.68%) and cholangitis (2.43%). 19 On the other hand, compared to conventional percutaneous biliary drainage EABS is characterized by similar technical and clinical success rates and significantly lower complication rates compared with the external drainage group as demonstrated in a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 EHG has recently been described as an effective and alternative method to percutaneous biliary drainage (PBD) in unresectable malignant biliary obstruction in case of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failure. 18 Technical success rate of this technique has been described to be as high as 98% and common adverse events are most commonly bleeding (4.03%), bile leakage (4.03%), stent migration (2.68%) and cholangitis (2.43%). 19 On the other hand, compared to conventional percutaneous biliary drainage EABS is characterized by similar technical and clinical success rates and significantly lower complication rates compared with the external drainage group as demonstrated in a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis caused by traumatic papillary irritation was reduced in EUS-HGS. 8 However, EUS-HGS is still challenging because of the complexity of the procedure, risk of severe adverse events, including stent migration, and lack of dedicated devices. 9 In addition, There are several problems to be resolved before EUS-HGS can be optimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 10 This provides an alternative to percutaneous or surgical drainage in cases of ERCP failure. 9 16 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] This provides an alternative to percutaneous or surgical drainage in cases of ERCP failure. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Despite numerous studies on the transmural approach to the biliary tract, which are currently available in the literature, many aspects of this technique remain unclear. This study aims to determine the role of the extra-anatomic transmural approach in biliary ET, by analyzing its effectiveness and safety, and the application of extra-anatomic endoscopic access to bile ducts in the treatment of patients with benign and malignant biliary obstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation