2021
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00532-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes and Return to Sports Following the Ankle Lateral Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Athletes: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, those with considerable laxity on initial presentation of a grade III injury risk failure of conservative management with functional rehabilitation and may require surgical intervention with further delay in return to competition. Therefore, surgical intervention in the form of acute lateral ligament repair may be considered in professional athletes as it provides a predictable recovery, high rate of RTS and reduced down- [3,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. With that being said, results obtained from this cohort of elite athletes are unique and are not advocated for the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, those with considerable laxity on initial presentation of a grade III injury risk failure of conservative management with functional rehabilitation and may require surgical intervention with further delay in return to competition. Therefore, surgical intervention in the form of acute lateral ligament repair may be considered in professional athletes as it provides a predictable recovery, high rate of RTS and reduced down- [3,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. With that being said, results obtained from this cohort of elite athletes are unique and are not advocated for the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most of the acute lateral ligament injuries respond to nonoperative management with functional rehabilitation, up to 9% of professional soccer players may sustain a re-injury the 1 3 same season and 34% within 3 years [5,6]. Despite controversies regarding treatment of grade III injuries, emerging evidence suggests that operative treatment for acute grade III injuries may allow earlier rehabilitation and an earlier return to sports (RTS) for elite athletes [3,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. This is because signiicantly less objective instability has been reported following surgical repair compared to nonoperative treatment [7,9,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While comparability is limited due to differences in prevalence of risk factors in the patient populations, results have to be benchmarked against the Broström repair technique and its modifications as the gold standard [ 2 , 5 , 12 ]. Heterogenous rates of RTS to previous level of sports rates ranging between 20 and 100% have been described following Broström repair, resulting in a pooled rate of 85% at a mean of 4.7 ± 1.5 [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the timing of RTS postoperatively, Ibrahim et al [20] reported a mean RTS at 6.8 months following ankle ligament reconstruction with a gracilis autograft, while Coughlin et al [3] reported RTS at a time point of 6.5 months postoperatively following ankle ligament reconstruction with a GT allograft; comparable to the results observed in the present study. Similarly, previous study observed diiculties to return to pre-injury level of sports following ankle ligament reconstruction [3,5] While comparability is limited due to differences in prevalence of risk factors in the patient populations, results have to be benchmarked against the Broström repair technique and its modiications as the gold standard [2,5,12]. Heterogenous rates of RTS to previous level of sports rates ranging between 20 and 100% have been described following Broström repair, resulting in a pooled rate of 85% at a mean of 4.7 ± 1.5 [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%