1999
DOI: 10.1080/03043799908923547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes Assessment and Accreditation in US Engineering Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This new set of accreditation requirements was entitled Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC 2000). It is acknowledged by many that EC 2000 significantly influences the assessment of undergraduate engineering education, requiring many engineering educators to re-examine the methods they employ to measure student performance and the attainment of required graduate attributes (Schachterle 1999, Burtner 2000.…”
Section: Assessment In Engineering Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new set of accreditation requirements was entitled Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC 2000). It is acknowledged by many that EC 2000 significantly influences the assessment of undergraduate engineering education, requiring many engineering educators to re-examine the methods they employ to measure student performance and the attainment of required graduate attributes (Schachterle 1999, Burtner 2000.…”
Section: Assessment In Engineering Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several decades ago, engineering educators expressed concern that accreditation impeded program creativity and innovation (Schachterle, 1999). Law (Leatherman, 1994) and education (Leatherman, 1991) expressed similar concerns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Outcome assessment is now one of the buzzwords used in CE2000 [7,8]. Interestingly enough, this project readily lends itself to outcome assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%