2018
DOI: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvy041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes associated with non-recommended dosing of rivaroxaban: results from the XANTUS study

Abstract: No. of tables: 4 (plus 2 supplementary tables) No. of figures: 4 No. of references: 15

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar patterns have been observed in patients treated with other NOACs, with under-dosing observed to be associated with higher risk for adverse events. 20,21 Importantly, the current data set is not powered to assess small differences in stroke rates, but there was no signal for a higher stroke rate in patients receiving the non-recommended low dose of edoxaban. However, there are too few events in patients taking the non-recommended doses to determine a clinically relevant, substantial difference compared with those taking the recommended doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Similar patterns have been observed in patients treated with other NOACs, with under-dosing observed to be associated with higher risk for adverse events. 20,21 Importantly, the current data set is not powered to assess small differences in stroke rates, but there was no signal for a higher stroke rate in patients receiving the non-recommended low dose of edoxaban. However, there are too few events in patients taking the non-recommended doses to determine a clinically relevant, substantial difference compared with those taking the recommended doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the XANTUS study, of the 3,794 patients with a CrCl ≥ 50 mL/min, only 583 (15.4%) patients received under-dose rivaroxaban (15 mg od in a global population). Compared with patients who received the recommended dose (20 mg od), the patients who received under-dose rivaroxaban were higher-risk patients, more likely to be > 75 years old, less likely to have CrCl > 80 mL/min, and more likely to have comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke/SE/TIA, and congestive heart failure) and higher CHADS 2 , CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, and HAS-BLED scores [19]. The trends in these studies are similar to the trends in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the XANTUS sub-analysis focused on outcomes associated with non-recommended dosing of rivaroxaban, the incidence rates in patients who received under-dosed rivaroxaban showed 3.9 events/100 patient-years for major bleeding and 2.7 events/100 patient-years for thromboembolic events (stroke, TIA, non-CNS SE, or MI) [19]. The rates in patients who received the recommended dose (20 mg od for patients with CrCl ≥ 50 mL/min and 15 mg od for patients with CrCl < 50 mL/min) were 2.6 events/100 patient-years and 1.9 events/100 patient-years, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a single-center experience, 23% of patients were either under- or overdosed with NOACs [ 18 ]. In larger populations, the rate of inappropriate dosing of apixaban ranged between 15 and 20% [ 19 – 21 ]. The reports about the consequences of inadequate underdosing are conflicting [ 19 – 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In larger populations, the rate of inappropriate dosing of apixaban ranged between 15 and 20% [ 19 – 21 ]. The reports about the consequences of inadequate underdosing are conflicting [ 19 – 21 ]. It might very well be that the clinical judgement of the treating physician with respect to appropriate dose of the patient is as good as the recommendations given in the label.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%