2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes following the treatment of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures with fine wire circular frame external fixation compared to open reduction and internal fixation: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have compared outcomes with the two treatment modalities for the management of tibial plateau fractures, but with conflicting results. A few systematic reviews and meta-analyses have also attempted to summarize existing evidence on the superiority of one treatment over the other [8][9][10]. Boutefnouchet et al [8] in their systematic review of 5 studies and Metcalfe et al [9] in their meta-analysis of 7 studies demonstrated similar results with either fixation technique for tibial plateau fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies have compared outcomes with the two treatment modalities for the management of tibial plateau fractures, but with conflicting results. A few systematic reviews and meta-analyses have also attempted to summarize existing evidence on the superiority of one treatment over the other [8][9][10]. Boutefnouchet et al [8] in their systematic review of 5 studies and Metcalfe et al [9] in their meta-analysis of 7 studies demonstrated similar results with either fixation technique for tibial plateau fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few systematic reviews and meta-analyses have also attempted to summarize existing evidence on the superiority of one treatment over the other [8][9][10]. Boutefnouchet et al [8] in their systematic review of 5 studies and Metcalfe et al [9] in their meta-analysis of 7 studies demonstrated similar results with either fixation technique for tibial plateau fractures. Later in 2017, in a meta-analysis of 11 studies, Zhao et al [10] also reported similar results but pointed out the deficiency of highquality studies in the literature comparing the two fixation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debnath et al [ 21 ], Gill and Raza [ 22 ], Zhao et al [ 23 ], and Nesari et al [ 24 ] believe that the Ilizarov technique is better for the management of complex tibial plateau fractures, which have extensive comminution with compromise of soft tissue and should be preferred over other methods. Whereas Tahir et al [ 25 ], Pineda et al [ 26 ], Metcalfe et al [ 27 ], and Boutefnouchet et al [ 28 ] believe that mode of fixation (ORIF or Ilizarov ring fixator) do not make any difference in the outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual (medial and lateral) incisions, locking fixation, and minimally invasive techniques have all reportedly contributed to fewer soft tissue and infectious complications. 17,21,31,[34][35][36][37][38] While two-stage treatment became a popular widespread practice, it is unclear to what extent this practice was responsible for improved results in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures compared to refined techniques of soft tissue dissection and implant evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16] Alternative strategies to avoid early open surgery include percutaneous fixation and definitive external fixation. 15, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] The benefits of two-stage treatment come with higher monetary costs related to multiple procedures, additional implants, and prolonged or repeat hospitalizations. Additionally, delayed definitive treatment may increase the difficulty of fracture reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%