2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of a laparoscopic approach for total abdominal colectomy and proctocolectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data shows that this operation is feasible and safe with no mortality and acceptable morbidity, as reported in previous studies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] (Table 5). The early postoperative results highlight problems with bowel function after total colectomy with a mean of 4.4 d until the first bowel movement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data shows that this operation is feasible and safe with no mortality and acceptable morbidity, as reported in previous studies [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] (Table 5). The early postoperative results highlight problems with bowel function after total colectomy with a mean of 4.4 d until the first bowel movement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…For selected patients presenting with mild disease in the rectum, no dysplasia and with normal rectal compliance, a subtotal colectomy with ileo-distal sigmoid anastomosis may be an alternative and was performed in this study. Few published reports exist and mainly report techniques performed for a single indication or include small numbers of patients [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] . The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of laparoscopic total colectomy based on indication, comparing IBD with other indications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our mean operative time was 187.5 min, fewer than that reported by the oldest series (330 min in the 2001 series of Marcello et al [5] and 292 min in the 2000 series of Dunker et al [6]), but similar to or less than the operative time reported for recent larger series (197 min in the 2006 series of McNevin et al [11] series, 210 min in the 2004 series of Maartense et al [1], and 320 min in the 2005 series of Kienle et al [4]. This can be explained by the experience in laparoscopic colonic surgery already achieved by the performing surgeon before attempting this procedure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Despite the considerable advances in surgical technique, equipment, and surgeon experience over the past decade, the benefits of minimized physiologic impact and shortened recovery had been reported in only a few studies of experienced surgeons. Therefore, some authors considered that the indications for these procedures in UC remain controversial [10,11]. However, a recent prospective study by Larson et al [12] and a randomized controlled trial by Maartense et al [1] concluded that laparoscopic proctocolectomy with IPAA offered a safe, feasible, and durable alternative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation