Outcomes of Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation With and Without Extracellular Matrix Cartilage Allograft Augmentation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus
Abstract:Background: Autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) using a cylindrical graft in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) is typically indicated for patients with larger lesions. However, with lesions that are irregular in shape, the AOT graft may not completely replace the lesion. For these lesions, we utilize extracellular matrix cartilage allograft (EMCA) augmentation in AOT to act as a physiologic grout at the host-graft interface. Purpose: To determine if the combination of EMCA w… Show more
Objective The primary aim was to determine and compare the complication rate of different surgical treatment options for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). The secondary aim was to analyze and compare the severity and types of complications. Design A literature search was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), and the Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Primary outcome was the complication rate per surgical treatment option. Secondary outcomes included the severity (using the Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink Complication Classification System for Orthopedic Surgery) and types of complications. The primary outcome, the severity, and the sub-analyses were analyzed using a random effects model. A moderator test for subgroup-analysis was used to determine differences. The types of complications were presented as rates. Results In all, 178 articles from the literature search were included for analysis, comprising 6,962 OLTs with a pooled mean age of 35.5 years and follow-up of 46.3 months. Methodological quality was fair. The overall complication rate was 5% (4%-6%; treatment group effect, P = 0.0015). Analysis resulted in rates from 3% (2%-4%) for matrix-assisted bone marrow stimulation to 15% (5%-35%) for metal implants. Nerve injury was the most observed complication. Conclusions In 1 out of 20 patients treated surgically for an OLT, a complication occurs. Metal implants have a significantly higher complication rate compared with other treatment modalities. No life-threatening complications were reported.
Objective The primary aim was to determine and compare the complication rate of different surgical treatment options for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs). The secondary aim was to analyze and compare the severity and types of complications. Design A literature search was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), and the Cochrane Library. Methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Primary outcome was the complication rate per surgical treatment option. Secondary outcomes included the severity (using the Modified Clavien-Dindo-Sink Complication Classification System for Orthopedic Surgery) and types of complications. The primary outcome, the severity, and the sub-analyses were analyzed using a random effects model. A moderator test for subgroup-analysis was used to determine differences. The types of complications were presented as rates. Results In all, 178 articles from the literature search were included for analysis, comprising 6,962 OLTs with a pooled mean age of 35.5 years and follow-up of 46.3 months. Methodological quality was fair. The overall complication rate was 5% (4%-6%; treatment group effect, P = 0.0015). Analysis resulted in rates from 3% (2%-4%) for matrix-assisted bone marrow stimulation to 15% (5%-35%) for metal implants. Nerve injury was the most observed complication. Conclusions In 1 out of 20 patients treated surgically for an OLT, a complication occurs. Metal implants have a significantly higher complication rate compared with other treatment modalities. No life-threatening complications were reported.
“…15 However, few studies paid attention to the depth of the subchondral lesion with small cysts presented. Traditional concepts suggest not to treat cystic lesions with microfracture 3,23 ; however, it is difficult to justify the use of osteochondral or osteoperiosteal transplantation for small cystic lesions. Jung et al 16,17 used microfracture to treat a group of cystic OLTs and reported promising clinical and radiographic outcomes based on pain and function scores and computed tomography scans.…”
Background: Whether arthroscopic microfracture is effective in treating cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) remains controversial. In this study, outcome parameters in patients with small and shallow subchondral cysts are compared to patients without cysts with the hypothesis that equivalent outcomes may be found after primary microfracture treatment. Methods: From 2018 to 2021, all 50 OLTs treated with arthroscopic microfracture in the authors’ hospital were retrospectively reviewed for eligibility. Single unilateral symptomatic lesions were included and divided into the cyst and noncyst groups, whereas kissing lesions and arthritic lesions were excluded. Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores, Tegner activity level scores, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging results were used to describe outcomes. Results: A total of 35 patients were included, 16 in the cyst group and 19 in the noncyst group. The patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups ( P > .05). In the cyst group the average cysts depth was 5.0 ± 1.3 mm. After a mean follow-up duration of 36.2 ± 10.2 months, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups in NRS, AOFAS, FAAM, or Tegner score improvement ( P > .05). Three patients (19%) in the cyst group had no NRS score improvement. Conclusion: OLTs with small and shallow subchondral cysts can be treated with arthroscopic microfracture and achieve similar outcomes as noncystic lesions. A few cystic lesions may not respond to microfracture treatment. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
“…The CBMA was truly biologically active, and the secretome produced was responsible not only for chondrogenic integration but was also chondroprotective of the surrounding cells. 17,18…”
Section: Concentrated Bone Marrow Aspiratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CBMA was truly biologically active, and the secretome produced was responsible not only for chondrogenic integration but was also chondroprotective of the surrounding cells. 17,18 Figure 1 A, Images identifying the anterior superior iliac crest, and a jamshidi needle is used to access the area between the inner and outer tables of the iliac crest. B, Heparin solution is within the syringe to prevent clotting.…”
Section: Concentrated Bone Marrow Aspiratementioning
Osteochondral lesions of the talus are common injuries in the ankle joint often resulting in early-onset osteoarthritis if left untreated. The avascular nature of articular cartilage limits healing capacity; therefore, surgical strategies are typically used in the treatment of these injuries. These treatments often result in the production of fibrocartilage rather than the native hyaline cartilage, which has decreased mechanical and tribological properties. Strategies to improve the ability of fibrocartilage to be more hyaline-like and thus more mechanically robust have been widely investigated. Biologic augmentation, including concentrated bone marrow aspirate, platelet-rich plasma, hyaluronic acid, and micronized adipose tissue, has been used in the augmentation of cartilage healing, with studies demonstrating promise. This article provides an overview and update on the various biologic adjuvants used in the treatment of cartilage injuries in the ankle joint.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.