Outcomes of autotransplanted teeth and prognostic factors: a 10-year retrospective study

Yang, Sujin; Jung, Bock-Young; Pang, nan sim

doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2412-3

Cited by 23 publications

(78 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…After screening the titles and abstracts of 443 articles, 38 potentially eligible articles were selected for full text 7 Andreasen et a (1990) 5 Frenken et al (1998) 11 Bauss et al (2003) 12 Bauss et al (2004) 13 Jonsson and Sigurdsson (2004) 14 Tanaka et al (2008) 15 Watanabe et al (2010) 6 Kokai et al (2015) 4 Yang et al (2019) 16 A clearly stated aim 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 Inclusion of consecutive patients 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 Prospective data collection 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 End points appropriate to the aim of the study…”

Section: Selection Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1). Lagerström and Kristerson, 7 Andreasen et al, 5 Frenken et al, 11 Bauss et al, 12 Bauss et al, 13 Jonsson and Sigurdsson, 14 Tanaka et al, 15 Watanabe et al, 6 Kokai et al, 4 and Yang et al 16 All studies were longitudinal, prospective, or retrospective controlled clinical trials that evaluated the results of autotransplantations in orthodontic patients (►Table 3).…”

Section: Selection Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All of the studies were written in English, although they had been conducted in different countries such as Sweden, 7 Denmark, 5 Holland, 11 Germany, 12,13 Iceland, 14 Japan, 4,6,15 and South Korea. 16 Five 5,7,12,13,16 studies reported the use of control groups with a minimum number of 30 patients with transplanted teeth without orthodontic movement, one study 11 used only 8 patients as control, and another four studies 4,6,14,15 used homologous or adjacent nontransplanted teeth as control of the autotransplanted teeth moved. The majority of the studies [4][5][6][11][12][13][14][15][16] used well-defined criteria of success for autotransplants, differently from the study of Lagerström and Kristerson.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…16 A total of 43 anterior teeth were also used 4,6,16 ; 23 in groups with orthodontic treatment 4,6,16 and another 20 teeth had no definition of the group. 16…”

Section: Characteristics Of Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The stage of root formation was described following the criteria of Moorrees et al, 17 by all the studies. [4][5][6][7][11][12][13][14][15][16] The autotransplanted teeth had different stages of root and apex formation in all the studies evaluated. [4][5][6][7][11][12][13][14][15][16] Only two 12,13 studies did not have autotransplanted teeth with complete roots in the groups at the time of surgery (►Table 5).…”

Section: Characteristics Of Interventions Preoperative Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Effect of Orthodontic Treatment on Tooth Autotransplantation: Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This systematic review was focused on evaluating tooth autotransplantation, considering its impacts on the teeth, bone, soft tissues, and aesthetics in orthodontic patients. A bibliographic search was conducted without limitations on year of publication or language in the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Medline Complete, Cochrane, Clinical Trials, and Trials Central. For triage of articles, indications, surgical planning, orthodontic movement, risk factors for treatment, and long-term follow-ups were considered. For outcomes, the results with reference to teeth, alveolar bone, periodontal tissues, and esthetic satisfaction were considered. Risk of bias was evaluated using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies-MINORS. The results showed 10 controlled clinical trials, and no randomized clinical trials were found. The selected studies included 715 patients and 934 autotransplanted teeth among which there were premolars, molars, and anterior teeth evaluated in the long term, indicating that orthodontics associated with autotransplantation indicated a result that was generally clinically acceptable. The quality of the set of evidence was considered medium due to the presence of different methodological problems, risk of bias, and significant heterogeneity in the evaluated studies. There was a sufficient body of evidence that justified autotransplantation in patients who needed orthodontic movement. In teeth, there was an increase in root resorption influenced by orthodontics, but without impacting on the general clinical result in the long term. Bone and periodontal tissue do not appear to be affected by orthodontics. The patient’s aesthetic satisfaction was not considered in the studies.

show abstract

Section: Selection Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Selection Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…16 A total of 43 anterior teeth were also used 4,6,16 ; 23 in groups with orthodontic treatment 4,6,16 and another 20 teeth had no definition of the group. 16…”

Section: Characteristics Of Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of Interventions Preoperative Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Effect of Orthodontic Treatment on Tooth Autotransplantation: Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Intentional replantation for a Class 4/Stage C cemental tear: Etiology, choice and outcomes of treatment

Luo,

Ying,

Tong

et al. 2024

Clinical Case Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Validation of a Cox prognostic model for tooth autotransplantation

Yoshino,

Yoshizawa,

Aoyama

et al. 2023

Clinical & Exp Dental Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThis study aimed to validate our Cox proportional hazards prognostic model for autotransplantation of teeth with complete root formation using prognostic index (PI) and determine whether the prognosis can be predicted.Patients and MethodsThe Protocol group, as a training data set for validation, consisted of 259 autotransplanted teeth to create a PI using the Cox model, as described previously. The Pre‐protocol group, as the first validation data set, consisted of 95 autotransplanted teeth treated without a protocol. The Post‐protocol group, as the second validation data set, consisted of 61 autotransplanted teeth obtained after the establishment of the prognostic model. Because four prognostic factors, including history of root canal treatment (yes), number of roots (multirooted), source of donor tooth (maxillary tooth), and duration of edentulism (≥2.5 months), were selected as a Cox prognostic model, 16 patterns of PI were constructed. First, the autotransplantated teeth in the Protocol group were divided into low‐ and high‐risk groups respectively according to the median of PI as the cutoff value. The survival curves of low‐ and high‐risk groups were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and tested using the log‐rank test. Then, in the Pre‐ and Post‐protocol groups, all transplanted teeth were divided into low‐and high‐risk teeth by the median of PI and the survival curves of low‐ and high‐ risk teeth were analyzed statistically in a similar manner.ResultsThe survival curves of the low‐ and high‐risk groups diverged significantly in the Protocol and Post‐protocol groups. In the Pre‐protocol group, the curves of the low‐ and high‐risk groups were separated, and the low‐risk survival rate was improved.ConclusionsOur Cox prognostic model for autotransplantation of teeth with complete root formation was useful in predicting the prognosis by external validation using PI.

show abstract

Outcomes of autotransplanted teeth and prognostic factors: a 10-year retrospective study

Abstract: Knowledge about the prognostic factors that are significantly associated with each particular clinical outcome may guide clinicians to achieve predictable and successful outcomes after tooth transplantation.

Cited by 23 publications

References 36 publications

Effect of Orthodontic Treatment on Tooth Autotransplantation: Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials

Effect of Orthodontic Treatment on Tooth Autotransplantation: Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trials

Intentional replantation for a Class 4/Stage C cemental tear: Etiology, choice and outcomes of treatment

Validation of a Cox prognostic model for tooth autotransplantation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About