2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Conservative Treatment in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conservative treatment of patients with CLTI has been reported to have acceptable results with respect to limb loss and patient death. A systematic review of conservative treatment for patients with CLTI reported an all-cause mortality rate of 18%, major lower-extremity amputation rate of 27%, and amputation-free survival rate of 60% after one year of follow-up [ 10 , 11 ]. The results from the systematic review suggest that conservative treatment is feasible for some patients with CLTI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conservative treatment of patients with CLTI has been reported to have acceptable results with respect to limb loss and patient death. A systematic review of conservative treatment for patients with CLTI reported an all-cause mortality rate of 18%, major lower-extremity amputation rate of 27%, and amputation-free survival rate of 60% after one year of follow-up [ 10 , 11 ]. The results from the systematic review suggest that conservative treatment is feasible for some patients with CLTI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of assessing perioperative risk and life expectancy in determining the treatment strategy for CLTI is already known [ 1 , 8 , 9 ]. Recent studies have suggested the effectiveness of conservative treatment for patients with CLTI who have foot wounds [ 10 , 11 ], and short-term life expectancy risks and expected wound healing rates should be considered in treatment decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In non-revascularisable CTLI, amputation-free survival was 43% at 5 years (251). A meta-analysis of 27 randomised control studies assessing conservative treatment found a 12-month mortality of 18% and amputation rate of 27% (252).…”
Section: Pathology and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is lack of knowledge and studies concerning the best endovascular treatment in CLTI and in particular treatment with DES in a cohort with only CLTI, and more complex FP lesions. 31,40,41 As a consequence of this, no fully relevant systematic reviews regarding this population yet appear in the literature. The aim of the current study was to determine any differences in treatment efficacy between BMS and DES treatment up to two years, in a parallel group trial with randomly allocated subjects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%