2016
DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000000776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Distal Femur Nonunions Treated with a Combined Nail/Plate Construct and Autogenous Bone Grafting

Abstract: SummaryIn this study, we sought to retrospectively evaluate union and infection rates after treatment of distal femur nonunions using a combined nail/plate construct with autogenous bone grafting. 10 patients treated at a Level I Trauma Center for nonunion of a femoral fracture using a combined nail/plate construct from 2004 to 2014 were included in the study. Union rate and postoperative infection rate were recorded.10 patients underwent treatment for nonunion of the distal femur. Mean interval from index sur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations of the above technique have been used successfully in the femur and tibia [ 14 , 15 ]; however, we are unaware of previously published reports of its use in the forearm. We are hopeful that this technique can be used by others in the future when select circumstances are present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations of the above technique have been used successfully in the femur and tibia [ 14 , 15 ]; however, we are unaware of previously published reports of its use in the forearm. We are hopeful that this technique can be used by others in the future when select circumstances are present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of a nail and plate can also be used for distal femoral nonunion. Attum et al 21 published a series of 10 patients with distal femoral nonunions treated with autologous bone grafting, intramedullary nail placement, and subsequent plate fixation. All fractures healed at a mean of 4 months.…”
Section: Endosteal or Medullary Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes a multitude of causes that have a cumulative or additive effects, including local bone marrow suppression, poor vascularity, immunosuppression, and aberrant cellular signaling ( 24 27 ). Introducing autologous bone graft and bone marrow aspirate concentrate to the fracture site to promote healing in fracture non-unions has proven to be clinically efficacious ( 28 31 ). These therapeutic interventions introduce several cell types, including cells of hematopoietic origin that are important for fracture healing ( 19 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%