2023
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Early versus Standard Closure of Diverting Ileostomy after Proctectomy

Sameh Hany Emile,
Nir Horesh,
Zoe Garoufalia
et al.

Abstract: Objective: We aimed to compare outcomes of early and standard closure of diverting loop ileostomy (DLI) after proctectomy and determine risk factors for anastomotic leak (AL) and complications. Summary Background Data: Formation of DLI has been a routine practice after proctectomy to decrease the incidence and potential adverse sequela of AL. Methods: PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched for rando… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sameh et al investigated many therapeutic approaches targeting the reduction of postoperative ileus incidence and severity after colorectal surgery. These results are consistent with our own studies, suggesting that avimopan is a common and successful method for reducing intestinal obstruction after surgery for colorectal cancer [ 119 ]. Electroacupuncture, in conjunction with chewing gum, is identified as an effective prophylactic therapy for postoperative ileus in this research.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Sameh et al investigated many therapeutic approaches targeting the reduction of postoperative ileus incidence and severity after colorectal surgery. These results are consistent with our own studies, suggesting that avimopan is a common and successful method for reducing intestinal obstruction after surgery for colorectal cancer [ 119 ]. Electroacupuncture, in conjunction with chewing gum, is identified as an effective prophylactic therapy for postoperative ileus in this research.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%