2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of endoscopic intervention for overt GI bleeding in severe thrombocytopenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides gastroenterologists with a broader range of platelet count regarding endoscopy and safety concerns, compared with the previously reported cut-off of 50 Â 10 3 /mL. 22,24,25 These previous studies had small patient sample size, which could have limited their power. In addition, some studies did not assess the risk of bleeding according to ASGE risk stratification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This provides gastroenterologists with a broader range of platelet count regarding endoscopy and safety concerns, compared with the previously reported cut-off of 50 Â 10 3 /mL. 22,24,25 These previous studies had small patient sample size, which could have limited their power. In addition, some studies did not assess the risk of bleeding according to ASGE risk stratification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An increased international normalized ratio (INR) >2, however, was a predictor of recurrent bleeding. 61 Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) is common among patients with cirrhosis and is the second most common cause of non-variceal GI bleeding. Its prevalence has been reported to range from 11% to 98%.…”
Section: Non-variceal Gastrointestinal Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistently, our studies reported that the INR and PT of severe patients were statistically higher than in mild patients. Compared with the thrombocytopenia frequently seen in populations with liver cirrhosis and hematologic malignancies, platelets in the severe group were not signi cantly different from the mild group, whereas platelets in the moderate group were signi cantly higher than in the mild group [20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%