2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2017.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Eyes with Failed Primary Surgery for Idiopathic Macular Hole

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of the described above patients presented bilateral FTMH, one eye was operated with anatomical success, and the second one failed to close after primary surgery, thus secondary PPV was performed. Reported secondary closure rate of revision surgeries was equal 76% [ 8 ]. Yek et al and colleagues observed 85% closure rate of FTMH after secondary vitrectomy [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two of the described above patients presented bilateral FTMH, one eye was operated with anatomical success, and the second one failed to close after primary surgery, thus secondary PPV was performed. Reported secondary closure rate of revision surgeries was equal 76% [ 8 ]. Yek et al and colleagues observed 85% closure rate of FTMH after secondary vitrectomy [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reported secondary closure rate of revision surgeries was equal 76% [ 8 ]. Yek et al and colleagues observed 85% closure rate of FTMH after secondary vitrectomy [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…found that extended and more complete ILM peeling could enhance the chance of MH closure. It has been shown that extended ILM peeling in a second surgery for patients with unsuccessful previous macular hole surgery leads to success in FTMH closure and visual acuity improvement [ 22 , 23 ]. Yek et al concluded that visual acuity gain after two years was significantly higher in eyes undergoing secondary surgery with extended ILM peeling after the first surgery failure than the eyes that were followed without any secondary intervention [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%