2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf03022513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of interfacility critical care adult patient transport: a systematic review

Abstract: Introduction We aimed to determine the adverse events and important prognostic factors associated with interfacility transport of intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1] Studies have shown that AEs during CCTs are significant and proportionate to the level of training and experience of the transferring practitioner. [5,6] A literature review in 2015, based on 33 recently published studies on complications during CCTs of adult patients, found that inter-hospital transfers had an AE rate as high as 34%. [5] This appears to be corroborated by a local study among paediatric admissions at a tertiary hospital which showed an AE rate of between 27% and 36%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[1] Studies have shown that AEs during CCTs are significant and proportionate to the level of training and experience of the transferring practitioner. [5,6] A literature review in 2015, based on 33 recently published studies on complications during CCTs of adult patients, found that inter-hospital transfers had an AE rate as high as 34%. [5] This appears to be corroborated by a local study among paediatric admissions at a tertiary hospital which showed an AE rate of between 27% and 36%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,6] A prospective 1-year audit conducted in SA in 2001 focused on CCTs of paediatric patients in a low-resource setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Open access medical services (HEMS) remains poorly understood, with no domain-specific AE taxonomy to draw from, no standardised way of defining harm, and no uniform AE reporting mechanisms. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Traditional methods of AE detection in healthcare typically include direct observation, morbidity and mortality review, documentation review, complaints, and voluntary reporting systems. 19 20 There is evidence to suggest that identification of AEs and harm is highly dependent on methodology employed.…”
Section: What This Study Addsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the potential for harm to occur in the delivery of emergency care by emergency medical services (EMS) is significant, and can include a multitude of contributing factors such as fatigue, differences in provider skill and training, errors in cognition and decision-making, communication, environmental factors and team dynamics 4 6–11. However, despite this potential, the incidence of AEs within the prehospital EMS and helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) remains poorly understood, with no domain-specific AE taxonomy to draw from, no standardised way of defining harm, and no uniform AE reporting mechanisms 12–18…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%