Outcomes of Intravascular Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Salazar, Samuel A.; Vengalasetti, Yasaswi; Kilbridge, Matthew; Gurusamy, Varshana; Powell, Alex; Schiro, Brian J.; Peña, Constantino; Gandhi, Ripal; Niekamp, Andrew

doi:10.1007/s00270-023-03510-1

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Disadvantages include challenges in reimbursement and added cost, though cost-effectiveness analyses compared to open CFA revascularisation have not been performed yet. Long-term data are lacking to date [ 49 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ].…”

Section: Narrative Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The DISRUPT PAD III trial has disclosed the distribution and further analysis of treated peripheral arteries, showing that the CFA was treated in 27 patients with different adjunctive therapies. Further subgroup analysis could be conducted for the DISRUPT PAD III trial and the data set from Salazar et al [ 54 , 56 ]. A prospective, multicentre, single-arm trial (FESTIVAL, NCT05821829) and another single-arm trial (CRUSH PAD) have been recruiting patients for CFA endovascular repair via lithotripsy to evaluate short-term safety and efficacy.…”

Section: Narrative Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In cases of missing information, this is indicated by NR, standing for not reported. Trials with low patient recruitments, different combinations of treatment modalities, and/or those lacking a subgroup analysis were excluded [ 54 , 56 , 59 , 63 , 64 ].…”

Section: Figurementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Percutaneous Endovascular Reconstruction of the Common Femoral Artery and Its Bifurcation

Rassam,

Coscas

2024

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Occlusive lesions of the common femoral artery (CFA) and its bifurcation have traditionally been treated with open surgery. Although long-term patency rates after open surgery are excellent, such repairs are associated with substantial local and general morbidity. In recent years, different treatment options have emerged within percutaneous endovascular repair. We hereby present a narrative review on endovascular treatment modalities and a treatment algorithm for endovascular revascularisation of the CFA and its bifurcation. Lesion analysis, access issues, vessel preparation tools, and types of repairs with or without the involvement of the bifurcation are described. Based on current data, an interventional approach can result in high technical success and acceptable mid-term patency rates. Further comparative evidence with open surgery and/or between the different types of endovascular repairs is required to improve the current treatment algorithm.

show abstract

Section: Narrative Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Narrative Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Percutaneous Endovascular Reconstruction of the Common Femoral Artery and Its Bifurcation

Rassam,

Coscas

2024

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy Use in the Femoro-Popliteal Segment: Considerations From an Expert Pan-European Panel Regarding Best-Care Practice

Saratzis,

Jane Messeder,

Thulasidasan

et al. 2024

J Endovasc Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Produce expert recommendations regarding the optimal use of Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) when treating femoro-popliteal steno-occlusive peripheral artery disease (PAD), guiding operators to use Shockwave IVL. Materials and Methods: A modified 3-step Delphi process was used to gain consensus surrounding preoperative/intraoperative/postoperative considerations when using Shockwave IVL for femoro-popliteal PAD. This included a structured survey, focus-group (with qualitative thematic analysis of views expressed), and final confirmatory round; participants were recruited across Europe including the United Kingdom/Switzerland. Results: Following a review to inform an online survey, 25 experts took part in a survey (5 European countries, 2023), followed by a focus-group (15 participants), 9 interviews, and final confirmatory round. A list of recommendations was prepared where at least moderate-level or high-level agreement was reached (≥70% participants agreeing). The recommendations relate to the optimal preoperative imaging, preoperative preparation(s), intraoperative imaging and use of adjuncts, as well as postoperative course, when using Shockwave IVL. Conclusion: A list of expert recommendations is provided guiding the optimal use of Shockwave IVL in femoro-popliteal PAD. This will help operators achieve better clinical outcomes. Clinical Impact This pan-European panel of experts using intravascular lithotripsy in routine peripheral arterial disease endovascular practice has provided important insights into best care practices before, during, and after such procedures. Several recommendations have been produced based on a structured consensus process to guide clinicians globally. This will improve and standardise the use of this technology in the femoro-popliteal arterial segment.

show abstract

Devices for aortoiliac occlusive disease

YU,

MILNER

2024

J Cardiovasc Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Outcomes of Intravascular Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Cited by 3 publications

References 11 publications

Percutaneous Endovascular Reconstruction of the Common Femoral Artery and Its Bifurcation

Percutaneous Endovascular Reconstruction of the Common Femoral Artery and Its Bifurcation

Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy Use in the Femoro-Popliteal Segment: Considerations From an Expert Pan-European Panel Regarding Best-Care Practice

Devices for aortoiliac occlusive disease

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About