2015
DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of laparoscopic hepatic resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma located at the liver surface: A case-control study with propensity score matching

Abstract: LH is an effective treatment for surface HCC with regard to control of local recurrence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was comparable to the previous FAA study using CEUS guidance (8.5%) [15], and superior to others using Doppler guidance (13.5-17.6%) [12][13][14]. In general, cumulative LTP rates at 3 years ranged from 10.0% to 38.6% in conventional RFA of HCC [36][37][38]. It seemed that FAA-RFA offered better local tumor control than older methods, especially facilitated by CEUS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This result was comparable to the previous FAA study using CEUS guidance (8.5%) [15], and superior to others using Doppler guidance (13.5-17.6%) [12][13][14]. In general, cumulative LTP rates at 3 years ranged from 10.0% to 38.6% in conventional RFA of HCC [36][37][38]. It seemed that FAA-RFA offered better local tumor control than older methods, especially facilitated by CEUS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…There are, however, some critical locations such as surface lesions and tumors close to organs or blood/biliary vessels that can make ablation challenging. These 'high risk' locations decrease the oncologic efficacy of RFA and the safety of the procedure [72][73][74].…”
Section: Liver Resection Vs Ablation For Very Early Hccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the relatively high curative rate of RFA, some patients still have local recurrence burden, and repeated RFA is effective for such patients . However, the penetration of the deployed expandable needles into a small portal branch could lead to intraportal tumor shedding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, treatment outcomes after RFA can be influenced by physicians’ expertise. Local recurrence rates after RFA vary from 2.4% to 36%, and its incidence was higher in patients undergoing RFA compared with those undergoing liver resection . Furthermore, tumor seeding after RFA is common even in a high‐volume center (0.7% to 1.4%) and is associated with subcapsular location, poorly differentiated HCC, and high level of serum α‐fetoprotein …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%