2023
DOI: 10.1159/000530305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Left Main Revascularization in Patients with Anemia: Gulf Left Main Registry

Abstract: Introduction: Evaluate the effects of baseline anemia and anemia following revascularization on outcomes in patients with Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery (ULMCA) disease. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study conducted between January 2015 to December 2019. The data on patients with ULMCA who underwent revascularization through PCI or CABG was stratified by hemoglobin level at baseline into anemic and non-anemic groups to compare in-hospital events. The pre-discharge hemogl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study is from The Gulf Left-Main registry database. [9][10][11][12][13][14] The study included patients who had CABG for unprotected left-main disease, were discharged on either single or DAPT, and had a follow-up of at least 6 months. Patients with protected left-main disease, hospital mortality, concomitant valve or aortic surgery, previous revascularization for LMCA disease, and patients who had follow-up for less than 6 months were excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Study Design and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study is from The Gulf Left-Main registry database. [9][10][11][12][13][14] The study included patients who had CABG for unprotected left-main disease, were discharged on either single or DAPT, and had a follow-up of at least 6 months. Patients with protected left-main disease, hospital mortality, concomitant valve or aortic surgery, previous revascularization for LMCA disease, and patients who had follow-up for less than 6 months were excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Study Design and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%