2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for redo mitral valve surgery according to Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Dudy Arman Hanafy,
Stefanie Melisa,
Galih Asa Andrianto
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown that right minithoracotomy in a re-intervention is associated with a lower rate of post-operative bleeding, morbidity and in-hospital death [10,18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that right minithoracotomy in a re-intervention is associated with a lower rate of post-operative bleeding, morbidity and in-hospital death [10,18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent meta-analyses comparing MIMVS vs. conventional resternotomy for redo mitral valve surgery showed an improved mortality rate in patients who had a minimally invasive approach rather than resternotomy [30,31]. A recent analysis of patients having mitral surgery after a previous sternotomy in the national Netherlands heart registry showed no difference in thirty-day mortality or five-year survival, although there was a lower incidence of prolonged intubation and new-onset arrhythmia in the minimally invasive group [32].…”
Section: Redo Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%