2019
DOI: 10.1111/jan.14229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of nurse practitioner‐led care in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Aim:To assess randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of nurse practitioner-led cardiovascular care.Background: Systematic review of nurse practitioner-led care in patients with cardiovascular disease has not been completed.Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Review Methods: Cochrane methodology was used for risk of bias, data extraction and meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.Results: Out of 605… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Leadership outcome indicators for NPs identified by Elliott et al (2014) include research in the form of research application, evaluation and knowledge generation. Smigorowsky et al (2019) argued that little is known about the outcomes of NP services owing to poor quality research. A similar evaluation has been forthcoming from Masso and Thompson (2017), who criticizes the lack of context in NP research to date, resulting in difficulties related to the transferability of the evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leadership outcome indicators for NPs identified by Elliott et al (2014) include research in the form of research application, evaluation and knowledge generation. Smigorowsky et al (2019) argued that little is known about the outcomes of NP services owing to poor quality research. A similar evaluation has been forthcoming from Masso and Thompson (2017), who criticizes the lack of context in NP research to date, resulting in difficulties related to the transferability of the evidence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Expand research on nursing interventions in pharmaceutical care. Nurses need to extend the available evidence on how they can contribute to improvement of clinical practice [ 75 , 76 , 77 ]. Expand research on interprofessional collaboration in pharmaceutical care.…”
Section: Advices To Strengthen Integrated Evidence-based Pharmaceutical Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurses need to extend the available evidence on how they can contribute to improvement of clinical practice [ 75 , 76 , 77 ].…”
Section: Advices To Strengthen Integrated Evidence-based Pharmaceutical Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, NPs play a key role in meeting these challenges and barriers to healthcare. NPs are able to diagnose, prescribe and order treatments, as they are independent practitioners that work collaboratively within a healthcare team (Smigorowsky et al, 2020). NPs are unique, as they use select medicine and advanced nursing skills that may result in greater benefits to patients and the healthcare system.…”
Section: Primary Care Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPs are unique, as they use select medicine and advanced nursing skills that may result in greater benefits to patients and the healthcare system. As such, NPs are associated with decreased costs, increased patient engagement with their care, and improved QoL (Smigorowsky et al, 2020). In the context of AF and HF, the NP in primary care are well situated to support patient care and to work alongside specialists, including cardiologists and NPs in the cardiac clinical setting.…”
Section: Primary Care Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%