Outcomes of pancreatectomy with portomesenteric venous resection and reconstruction for locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gudmundsdottir, Hallbera; Tomlinson, Jennifer L.; Graham, Rondell P.; Thiels, Cornelius A.; Warner, Susanne G.; Smoot, Rory L.; Kendrick, Michael L.; Nagorney, David M.; Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R.; Habermann, Elizabeth B.; Truty, Mark J.; Cleary, Sean P.

doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2021.12.016

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The clinical evidence is limited for patients with SMA invasion, and whether arterial resection and reconstruction are recommended is still controversial. [55][56][57] However, in the ENENTS guidelines, the criteria for defining the surgical resectability of the primary lesion of pNENs did not consider the degree of peripancreatic vascular invasion. Experts have reached the consensus that the resectability of primary pNENs lesions can be determined based on the criteria of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.…”

Section: Expert Consensusmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chinese expert consensus on multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases

Chi,

Jiang,

Shi

et al. 2023

Journal of Pancreatology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many management strategies are available for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with liver metastases. However, a lack of biological, molecular, and genomic information and an absence of data from rigorous trials limit the validity of these strategies. This review presents the viewpoints from an international conference consisting of several expert working groups. The working groups reviewed a series of questions of particular interest to clinicians taking care of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with liver metastases by reviewing the existing management strategies and literature, evaluating the evidence on which management decisions were based, developing internationally acceptable recommendations for clinical practice, and making recommendations for clinical and research endeavors. The review for each question will be followed by recommendations from the panel.

show abstract

Section: Expert Consensusmentioning

confidence: 99%