2018
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.4018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE): Global OPTIMIS final analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional TACE involves the intra‐arterial infusion of chemotherapy and embolization of the tumors' feeding vessels causing a local cytotoxic and ischemic effect 22 . Complete and partial tumor response to a first TACE treatment may be only 14% and 26%, respectively 28 . Previous studies evaluating TACE have shown improvements in median overall survival when compared with control, with median survival reaching at best up to 28.7 months, 6‐8 which is less than survival rates attributed to resection or ablation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional TACE involves the intra‐arterial infusion of chemotherapy and embolization of the tumors' feeding vessels causing a local cytotoxic and ischemic effect 22 . Complete and partial tumor response to a first TACE treatment may be only 14% and 26%, respectively 28 . Previous studies evaluating TACE have shown improvements in median overall survival when compared with control, with median survival reaching at best up to 28.7 months, 6‐8 which is less than survival rates attributed to resection or ablation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…switched to sorafenib, with the remaining 460 (90.7%) being selected for continued TACE but not sorafenib in the follow-up period. [18] This result suggests that a significant number of patients with HCC in the clinic are treated with TACE, despite the absence of an adequate indication based on the concept of TACE refractoriness. [18] Therefore, our findings, added to the OPTIMIS study results, clearly show that systemic therapy for HCC after TACE refractoriness is not commonly used in clinical settings and that the time for starting systemic therapy varies widely.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] This result suggests that a significant number of patients with HCC in the clinic are treated with TACE, despite the absence of an adequate indication based on the concept of TACE refractoriness. [18] Therefore, our findings, added to the OPTIMIS study results, clearly show that systemic therapy for HCC after TACE refractoriness is not commonly used in clinical settings and that the time for starting systemic therapy varies widely. In South Korea, once systemic therapy has been initiated for HCC, the national insurance program does not cover further TACE or other locoregional treatment options.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the heterogeneous BCLC B stage, several controversies still concern the adequate timing for the transition from locoregional to systemic therapies. Whereas lack of response after two rounds of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or progression of previously treated lesions indicates locoregional treatment failures, in a real‐world setting, these findings do not necessarily lead to an anticipated shift toward a systemic strategy . On top of that, it appears that a sizeable fraction of BCLC C patients still receives upfront TACE, which may contribute to acute and chronic liver function deterioration, despite a clear indication for other treatment options.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas lack of response after two rounds of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or progression of previously treated lesions indicates locoregional treatment failures, in a real‐world setting, these findings do not necessarily lead to an anticipated shift toward a systemic strategy . On top of that, it appears that a sizeable fraction of BCLC C patients still receives upfront TACE, which may contribute to acute and chronic liver function deterioration, despite a clear indication for other treatment options. Therefore, the possibility to identify those patients who might benefit from earlier transitions to systemic treatments speaks to the crucial role played by multidisciplinary teams that convene surgeons, interventional radiologists, hepatologists, and medical oncologists.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%