2015
DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-15-0484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Performed With or Without Preprocedural Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Japan Cardiovascular Database (JCD) Keio interhospital Cardiovascular Study (KiCS) is a large, ongoing, prospective multicenter cohort study designed to record the clinical background and outcome data of PCI patients in Japan [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Major teaching hospitals within the metropolitan Tokyo area were selected (15 institutions).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Japan Cardiovascular Database (JCD) Keio interhospital Cardiovascular Study (KiCS) is a large, ongoing, prospective multicenter cohort study designed to record the clinical background and outcome data of PCI patients in Japan [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Major teaching hospitals within the metropolitan Tokyo area were selected (15 institutions).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite improvements in treatment, it remains the leading cause of death in STEMI patients. 26, 27 Patients with a decrease in blood pressure and an increase in heart rate are at risk of developing cardiogenic shock. The shock index is an accurate and easily assessable risk marker at the time of initial evaluation, which combines the information of systolic blood pressure and heart rate.…”
Section: Shock Index and Clinical Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27] In this study, numerically higher rates of bleeding events were observed in the > 12-month group compared to ≤ 12-month group, but the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. Larger registry data or randomized trial is needed to evaluate clinical relevance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%