2019
DOI: 10.1111/pace.13726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of percutaneous vacuum‐assisted debulking of large vegetations as an adjunct to lead extraction

Abstract: Background: Consensus statements on lead extraction give consideration to open surgicalremoval in the setting of large vegetations, to mitigate the risk of massive embolism that may occur with percutaneous lead removal. Vacuum-assisted debulking (VD) of large vegetations as an adjunct to percutaneous lead extraction may provide an opportunity to mitigate these risks. Methods:We retrospectively identified all patients undergoing lead extraction at our institution for endovascular infection from 2012 to 2018 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suction should be turned off when blood flow to the vacuum canister resumes. The published data on success rates of thrombus removal using the Angiovac system is limited to case reports comparable in size to this one 4,7,17–20 . The amount of data available is not sufficient to compare the outcomes with the two techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Suction should be turned off when blood flow to the vacuum canister resumes. The published data on success rates of thrombus removal using the Angiovac system is limited to case reports comparable in size to this one 4,7,17–20 . The amount of data available is not sufficient to compare the outcomes with the two techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The published data on success rates of thrombus removal using the Angiovac system is limited to case reports comparable in size to this one. 4,7,[17][18][19][20] The amount of data available is not sufficient to compare the outcomes with the two techniques. likely better approached with the Angiovac system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical lead extraction is recommended for cases with lead vegetations larger than 2.5 cm 4 . Recently, debulking large lead vegetations using a vacuum catheter system has been attempted 10 . The indication for surgical lead extraction might change in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a clear benefit of vacuum-assisted debulking of lead vegetations over a conventional percutaneous extraction has not yet been proven [ 9 ], the preliminary results of the AngioVac system for the aspiration of intracardiac masses are promising [ 16 ]. Successful removal rates vary depending on the specific origin and location of the mass, ranging between 60 and 80% in larger registries and series [ 16 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AngioVac system (AngioDynamics, Latham, NY, USA) is a novel percutaneous technology that includes an aspiration cannula combined with a filter, a centrifugal pump, and a venous or arterial reinfusion cannula, intended for the intravascular aspiration of right-sided masses. This device has found an application for CDRIE vegetations debulking before lead extraction [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ]. A systematic review of literature by Rusia et al in 2019 collected a total of 88 patients in whom this device has been successfully adopted to treat CDRIE in 97.7% of cases [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%