2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.03.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of press-fit radial head arthroplasty following complex radial head fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this is the first reported case series using this implant; however, it should be noted that it is not being distributed currently for economic reasons. The revision rates are better than those previously reported for anatomic designs, 26,28,29,38 and the range of motion achieved is comparable to previous studies, 37 although the initial injury complexity is much higher.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To our knowledge, this is the first reported case series using this implant; however, it should be noted that it is not being distributed currently for economic reasons. The revision rates are better than those previously reported for anatomic designs, 26,28,29,38 and the range of motion achieved is comparable to previous studies, 37 although the initial injury complexity is much higher.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The survivorship was found to be better when the implant was used for acute trauma rather than as a salvage procedure, but this observation may have occurred by chance; 11% of patients required removal or revision (at an average of 38.6 months post-implantation of RHP), which is better than previously reported results for press-fit RHPs. 2629…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 Lobo-Escolara et al in a study of 45 patients of radial head prostheses published in 2021 demonstrated a survival rate of 70% at the 2 year mark, with a complication rate of 25% for press-fit stems. 18 A recent systematic review outlined that aseptic loosening is the commonest cause for revision surgery (30%), followed by stiffness (20%), and persisting pain (17%). Press fit stems fail at a higher rate because of symptomatic loosening.…”
Section: Prosthetic Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luis Lobo-Escolar et al 1 published a study on the outcomes of press-fit radial head arthroplasty following complex radial head fractures. They had 45 patients in their study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%