“…Furthermore, within a subsequent study by Nikolopoulou and Steemers [94] six intangible characteristics were identified and correlated to pedestrian psychology within outdoor environments, namely: naturalness, expectations, past experience, time of exposure, and #i [88] (Review Article) Analysed eight outdoor thermal comfort studies that combined thermal indices with behavioural aspects and concluded that the perception of thermal comfort should be approached through four interconnected levels: (i) physical, (ii) physiological, (iii) psychological, and (iv) social/behavioural #ii [89] Identified that although the presence of comfort conditions generally led to a higher amount of pedestrians, only 35% of the interviewees were located within theoretical comfort conditions #iii [90] Identified that transitory exposure and thermal expectation can present a major influence on pedestrian subjective assessments and thermal contentment, and that 'steady-state' models such as PMV were revealed to be inappropriate for the assessment of short-term outdoor thermal comfort #iv [91] In line with the European Union project RUROS [92], it was identified that the behaviour of pedestrians was dependant both on the outdoor thermal conditions and individual expectations. Such a result was exemplified when people left air conditioned/indoor contexts for direct sunshine, even if such an exposure implied PET values that would exceed comfort ranges #v [79] Within the study's field survey, it was identified that 90% of pedestrians chose to stay under shade trees or shelters.…”