2004
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2004.10470983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outdoor Versus Indoor Contributions to Indoor Particulate Matter (PM) Determined by Mass Balance Methods

Abstract: This study compares an indoor-outdoor air-exchange mass balance model (IO model) with a chemical mass balance (CMB) model. The models were used to determine the contribution of outdoor sources and indoor resuspension activities to indoor particulate matter (PM) concentrations. Simultaneous indoor and outdoor measurements of PM concentration, chemical composition, and air-exchange rate were made for five consecutive days at a single-family residence using particle counters, nephelometers, and filter samples … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, other factors may cause the elevated PM2.5. Indoor PM2.5 directly linked to the human activities such as walking on carpet or dry dusting and vacuuming the room which could resuspend the particles Kopperud and Ferro 2004;Cao et al 2005). In this study, resuspension of dust from the carpet in classroom 1, when disturbed by students, may be a reason for its high PM2.5 levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Thus, other factors may cause the elevated PM2.5. Indoor PM2.5 directly linked to the human activities such as walking on carpet or dry dusting and vacuuming the room which could resuspend the particles Kopperud and Ferro 2004;Cao et al 2005). In this study, resuspension of dust from the carpet in classroom 1, when disturbed by students, may be a reason for its high PM2.5 levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Note that empirical (Liu and Nazaroff, 2003;Long et al, 2001) and modeling (Liu and Nazaroff, 2001) studies of PM 2.5 suggest P values less than unity, typically between 0.6 and 1.0. However, to the extent that P is less than unity, this fact is accounted for in the experimentally determined k values (Kopperud et al, 2004). Air-exchange rates, a, are based on Wilson et al (1996).…”
Section: Inhalation Intake Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship of indoor and outdoor particulate matter was examined in several environments [27][28][29][30][31][32] and the reported results strongly associated the indoor PM concentration with the outdoor one. In respect to particle dynamics and using mass balance models, the authors managed to determine deposition indoors and penetration from outdoors, although the variability of the results indicated the strong dependence on assumptions, different methodologies and building characteristics [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%