2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outer boundary conditions for evolving cool white dwarfs

Abstract: Context. White dwarf evolution is essentially a gravothermal cooling process, which, for cool white dwarfs, depends on the treatment of the outer boundary conditions. Aims. We provide detailed outer boundary conditions that are appropriate to computing the evolution of cool white dwarfs by employing detailed nongray model atmospheres for pure hydrogen composition. We also explore the impact on the white dwarf cooling times of different assumptions for energy transfer in the atmosphere of cool white dwarfs. Met… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
48
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…At this stage, latent heat release upon crystallization was neglected. When the same OPAL radiative opacities and Cassisi et al (2007) electron conduction opacities, photospheric boundary conditions from the model atmospheres by Rohrmann et al (2012), neutrino energy loss rates (Itoh et al 1996;Haft et al 1994), and EOS (Magni & Mazzitelli 1979) are employed, cooling times obtained from the two codes agree within ∼2% at all luminosities, with the exclusion of models brighter than log(L/L ) ∼ −1.5, where differences up to ∼8% appear because of the different thermal structure of the first white dwarf structure converged at the beginning of the cooling sequence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At this stage, latent heat release upon crystallization was neglected. When the same OPAL radiative opacities and Cassisi et al (2007) electron conduction opacities, photospheric boundary conditions from the model atmospheres by Rohrmann et al (2012), neutrino energy loss rates (Itoh et al 1996;Haft et al 1994), and EOS (Magni & Mazzitelli 1979) are employed, cooling times obtained from the two codes agree within ∼2% at all luminosities, with the exclusion of models brighter than log(L/L ) ∼ −1.5, where differences up to ∼8% appear because of the different thermal structure of the first white dwarf structure converged at the beginning of the cooling sequence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Calculations of both LPCODE and BaSTI models with the EOS of Magni & Mazzitelli (1979), electron conduction opacities by Cassisi et al (2007), employing now photospheric boundary conditions taken at an optical depth τ = 25 from the model atmospheres by Rohrmann et al (2012) when T eff < 10 000 K 2 . The same table of photospheric boundary conditions is used in both calculations.…”
Section: Calculations and Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the metal mass fraction Z in the envelope of our models is specified by scaling it to the local abundance of the CNO elements at each layer. For the white dwarf regime and for effective temperatures lower than 10 000 K, outer boundary conditions for the evolving models are derived from nongrey model atmospheres (Rohrmann et al 2012). Recently, LPCODE has been tested against other white dwarf code.…”
Section: Numerical Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, abundance changes resulting from atomic element diffusion were considered during the white dwarf regime. -For the white-dwarf stage and for effective temperatures lower than 10,000 K, outer boundary conditions for the evolving models are derived from non-gray model atmospheres (Rohrmann et al 2012). Table 1 lists the initial masses of the sequences, the resulting white dwarf masses, the hydrogen mass fraction, log (M H /M ⊙ ), and the surface carbon to oxygen ratio, C/O, at the beginning of the white dwarf phase.…”
Section: Evolutionary Models and Numerical Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%