1966
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-3553-8_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outer Zone Protons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increases in the proton population of the Van Allen belts during magnetic storms have been observed and described in literature [Mcllwain, 1965;Davis, 1965;Davis and Williamson, 1966;and Vernov et al, 1965].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Increases in the proton population of the Van Allen belts during magnetic storms have been observed and described in literature [Mcllwain, 1965;Davis, 1965;Davis and Williamson, 1966;and Vernov et al, 1965].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Early observations at energies >100 keV [ Davis and Williamson , , ] and at lower energies [ Frank , , , ] established the understanding that these magnetospheric ions were associated with the development of the ring current. Later studies determined that the relevant ring current population associated with geomagnetic disturbances during storms existed at energies between ∼20 and 300 keV [ Smith and Hoffman , ; Berko et al , ; Williams and Lyons , ; Williams , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the outer proton radiation belt has been observed by spacecraft instrumentation for five decades [e.g., Davis and Williamson , , ; Yershkovitch et al , ; Stevens et al , ; Spjeldvik , ; Fritz and Spjeldvik , ; Sheldon , ; Green et al , ; Lazutin et al , , ; Tverskaya et al , ; Forster et al , ], much less is known about its properties and dynamics than is known about the outer electron radiation belt. Modeling efforts for the outer proton radiation belt in those five decades [e.g., Nakada and Mead , ; Spjeldvik , ; Beutier et al , ; Bourdarie et al , ; Boscher et al , ; Vacaresse et al , ; Panasyuk , ; Smolin , , ] have been much less sophisticated than the modeling efforts for the outer electron radiation belt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%