2004
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20034065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outflows and accretion in a star-disc system with stellar magnetosphere and disc dynamo

Abstract: Abstract.The interaction between a protostellar magnetosphere and a surrounding dynamo-active accretion disc is investigated using an axisymmetric mean-field model. In all models investigated, the dynamo-generated magnetic field in the disc arranges itself such that in the corona, the field threading the disc is anti-aligned with the central dipole so that no X-point forms. When the magnetospheric field is strong enough (stellar surface field strength around 2 kG or larger), accretion happens in a recurrent fa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
50
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
6
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that previous numerical studies of star-disk interactions have shown that differential rotation between the star and the inner disk regions where the stellar magnetosphere is anchored may lead to field lines opening and reconnection, which eventually restores the initial magnetospheric configuration (e.g., Goodson & Winglee 1999;Matt et al 2002;Uzdensky et al 2002;Romanova et al 2004;von Rekowski & Brandenburg 2004;Zanni 2009; see also Alencar 2007, for a review). Magnetospheric reconnection cycles are expected by most numerical models to develop in a few Keplerian periods at the inner disk, and be accompanied by time dependent accretion onto the star and by episodic outflow events as reconnection takes place.…”
Section: In the Context Of Ysosmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…We note that previous numerical studies of star-disk interactions have shown that differential rotation between the star and the inner disk regions where the stellar magnetosphere is anchored may lead to field lines opening and reconnection, which eventually restores the initial magnetospheric configuration (e.g., Goodson & Winglee 1999;Matt et al 2002;Uzdensky et al 2002;Romanova et al 2004;von Rekowski & Brandenburg 2004;Zanni 2009; see also Alencar 2007, for a review). Magnetospheric reconnection cycles are expected by most numerical models to develop in a few Keplerian periods at the inner disk, and be accompanied by time dependent accretion onto the star and by episodic outflow events as reconnection takes place.…”
Section: In the Context Of Ysosmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Several theoretical models and numerical simulations have been proposed and carried out to study this complex magnetospheric interaction and attempt to reproduce observations, in particular the typical sizes of magnetospheric gaps and rotation periods of cTTSs. Initially restricted to dipolar magnetospheres (Romanova et al 2002;von Rekowski & Brandenburg 2004; the disc to the star and of accretion spots at funnel footpoints, whose locations and geometries are found to depend strongly on the inclination of the magnetosphere with respect to the rotation axis of both the disc and the protostar (e.g., Romanova et al 2003Romanova et al , 2004 as well as on the large-scale topology of the field (e.g., Gregory et al 2006;Long et al 2008). The size of the magnetospheric gap is however still difficult to reconcile with observed large-scale field strengths Bessolaz et al 2008;Gregory et al 2008) and simulations fail to confirm that the magnetic torque from the accretion disc is strong enough to spin the star down as observations suggest (e.g., Bessolaz et al 2008); a braking contribution from an accretion-powered magnetised stellar wind may help solving the problem (Matt & Pudritz 2005).…”
Section: Magnetospheric Accretion Angular Momentum Regulation and Prmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this -meanwhile -standard approach, further physical effects were investigated, such as the influence of the disk magnetization (Tzeferacos et al 2009), the launching from viscous disks (Murphy et al 2010), thermal effects (Tzeferacos et al 2013), or even the launching of outflows from a magnetic field, selfgenerated by a mean-field disk dynamo (von Rekowski & Brandenburg 2004;von Rekowski et al 2003;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%