2013
DOI: 10.1111/lsi.12000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outing Courtesy: The Role of Rude Dissent in Rule of Law Systems

Abstract: This essay critically examines Keith Bybee's All Judges Are Political, Except When They Are Not. Although Bybee's creative use of the cultural form of courtesy helps us better understand the consensus‐building and legitimating features of rule‐of‐law systems, it overlooks the role that rude dissent can play in exposing the violent, exclusionary, and materially disadvantaging aspects of such systems. Using examples of outing closeted public figures and the rude AIDS activism of the 1990s, this essay explores th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The powerful have long used allegations of incivility to shield themselves from critique, maintain power structures, and inscribe certain voices and bodies as (in)appropriate in certain spaces (Bybee, 2016; Westacott, 2012), leading to some voices being effectively excluded from decision-making processes. As Zerilli (2014: 16) writes, “the practice of civility itself has often-times worked to mask relations of power in a thin veneer of politeness.” Civility may further “conceal the violence that underlies it, leading the materially disadvantaged to be blamed when violence visibly erupts” (Burgess, 2013: 209). Bybee (2016) discusses the charge of incivility leveled at social movements including Anti-Federalists, abolitionists, civil rights activists, feminists, Black Lives Matter, and anti-war activists.…”
Section: Locating the Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The powerful have long used allegations of incivility to shield themselves from critique, maintain power structures, and inscribe certain voices and bodies as (in)appropriate in certain spaces (Bybee, 2016; Westacott, 2012), leading to some voices being effectively excluded from decision-making processes. As Zerilli (2014: 16) writes, “the practice of civility itself has often-times worked to mask relations of power in a thin veneer of politeness.” Civility may further “conceal the violence that underlies it, leading the materially disadvantaged to be blamed when violence visibly erupts” (Burgess, 2013: 209). Bybee (2016) discusses the charge of incivility leveled at social movements including Anti-Federalists, abolitionists, civil rights activists, feminists, Black Lives Matter, and anti-war activists.…”
Section: Locating the Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burgess (Burgess 2013, 206) also embraces the move to viewing law through the cultural form of courtesy, but ups the ante. Exploring and exposing “the unpleasant underbelly of courtesy and the rule of law,” Burgess turns Bybee's analysis inside “out” by underscoring how courtesy and law materially disadvantage those defined as deviant.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%