2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2015.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outlier detection using neighborhood rank difference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A better quantification of the actual distribution of the scores via, e.g., GMM, Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) [27], or Neighborhood Rank Difference (NRD) [8] rather than assuming multi-variate normality could improve monitoring performance. However, these techniques typically assume that a high number of data points-in this case: normal batches-is available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A better quantification of the actual distribution of the scores via, e.g., GMM, Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) [27], or Neighborhood Rank Difference (NRD) [8] rather than assuming multi-variate normality could improve monitoring performance. However, these techniques typically assume that a high number of data points-in this case: normal batches-is available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the various issues over the choice of appropriate number of nearest neighbors with improvement in the classification accuracy in machine learning and pattern recognition domain was presented in [15][16][17]21]. While issues related to the size of training sample set and its impact on classification performance using nearest neighbor rule was presented in [18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel method has been proposed using neighbourhood rank difference for the detection of outliers. The results of experiments are recorded for real and synthetic datasets with different dimensions [7]. This paper proposes a framework for detecting outliers in evolving data streams.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%