1980
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-1980-0572873-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outline of a proof that every odd perfect number has at least eight prime factors

Abstract: An argument is outlined which demonstrates that every odd perfect number is divisible by at least eight distinct primes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chein [2] and Hagis [7] independently showed that n must have at least 8 distinct prime factors, and this bound was recently improved to 9 by Nielsen [18]. Hare [9] showed that n must have totally at least 47 prime factors, and he recently improved this bound to 75 in [10].…”
Section: (Mod 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chein [2] and Hagis [7] independently showed that n must have at least 8 distinct prime factors, and this bound was recently improved to 9 by Nielsen [18]. Hare [9] showed that n must have totally at least 47 prime factors, and he recently improved this bound to 75 in [10].…”
Section: (Mod 4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= 0 (mod 2). It is easy to show that /' > 2, and we make implicit use of this below; in fact, it is known that j >1 (Hagis [6]). Each py , and q , are called components of N.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout this paper N will represent an odd perfect number, and o>(N) will denote the number of distinct prime factors of TV. It was shown in [1] that w(7V) > 8, while if 3 J TV it was proved by Kishore [6] that u(N)> 10. The purpose of the present paper is to sketch a proof of the following improvement of Kishore's result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%