Outpatient Management of Oligosymptomatic Patients with respiratory infection in the era of SARS-CoV-2: Experience from rural German general practitioners

Abstract

Background Covid-19 is causing a pandemic and forces physicians to restructure their work. We want to share our experience in the outpatient management of potentially-infected patients with special consideration of altered national test strategies during the crisis. Methods We analysed patients with respiratory symptoms reporting to our three rural general practitioner (GP) offices in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, from 27.01–20.04.2020 (n = 489 from a total of 6090 patients). A history of symptoms was taken at the doorstep following a specific questionnaire. Patients with respiratory symptoms were examined in a separated isolation area, while the others were allowed to enter the office. We applied the first recommended algorithm of the German Robert Koch Institute (RKI) to test suspected patients and compared our results with an adapted, more liberal version of the RKI, which is currently applied in Germany. Results Eighty patients (16.36%, mean age: 47.03 years+ − 18.08) were sent to a nasopharyngeal smear. Five patients (6.25%) proved to be positive, four of whom had established risk factors for COVID-19. Overall, the most common symptoms were cough (83.75%), sore throat (71.25%), as well as myalgia and fatigue (66.25%). The most common diagnoses were rhinopharyngitis (37.22%) and acute bronchitis (30.27%). A sore throat was more common in positively-tested patients (80% vs. 12%). Applying the first RKI test strategy yielded 6.25% of positive tests (n = 80), while the more liberal later RKI recommendation would have achieved 1.36% positive tests from 369 patients. No positive test was missed by applying the conservative strategy. None of our employees called in sick during this period, which emphasises the efficacy and safety of our screening methods. Conclusion A clinical distinction between ordinary respiratory infections and COVID-19 is not possible in a low-prevalence population. Our model to prevent unprotected physical contact, screen patients in front of the office with protective equipment, and examine respiratory infections in separated areas works in the GP setting without overt health risks for employees. Thus, this approach should be used as a GP standard to uphold patient care without major health risks for the personnel. Large multi-centre studies are necessary to work out the most suitable test strategy.

Stockpiled personal protective equipment and knowledge of pandemic plans as predictors of perceived pandemic preparedness among German general practitioners

“…As Germany has a federated and self-governing system in the healthcare sector with 17 self-regulatory regional organization for the outpatient sector, clear division of responsibilities was often absent [ 21 ]. Many physicians complained about a general, long-lasting shortage of PPE [ 22 , 23 ].…”

A Mixture of Essential Oils from Three Cretan Aromatic Plants Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Proliferation: A Proof-of-Concept Intervention Study in Ambulatory Patients

“…This is an interesting question; to that direction, we decided to include family members (father, mother, and sister of one patient) and individuals working together or living in the same house. We consider this a vital reporting aspect in establishing guidelines for sequential testing, managing oligo- or asymptomatic patients in outpatient settings, and informing future clinical study design across settings, as highlighted by a recent report [ 33 ]. The median incubation period of five days (even of approximately four and three days for the Delta and Omicron variants, respectively) creates a false sense of safety but also presents a challenge in terms of study inclusion and proper trial conduct and reporting [ 34 ].…”

COVID-19 preparedness and response in rural and remote areas: A scoping review

“…Rural primary care physicians in Germany re-organised their practices to screen and triage patients, as well as managing patients remotely by telephone or video. They also observed a higher probability for more severe disease in COVID-19 patients in rural areas [117,118]. In China, one study reported that primary care practitioners took on key public health roles of tracing, screening, and educating in rural areas [119].…”