2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.asj.2008.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outpatient reduction mammaplasty: An eleven-year experience

Abstract: This retrospective series is the largest to date involving outpatient reduction mammaplasty. Complication data derived from this series are comparable to previously published studies and thus support the safety and efficacy of outpatient reduction mammaplasty performed in an accredited facility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prolonged drainage period diminishes patient comfort, causes a delay in the starting of arm exercises as well as discharge from hospital [9]. Although the drainage period was statistically significant in the plasmacautery group, this did not affect hospital stay and the starting of arm exercises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prolonged drainage period diminishes patient comfort, causes a delay in the starting of arm exercises as well as discharge from hospital [9]. Although the drainage period was statistically significant in the plasmacautery group, this did not affect hospital stay and the starting of arm exercises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prolonged drainage period diminishes patient comfort, causes a delay in the starting of arm exercises as well as dis charge from hospital [9]. Although the drainage period was statistically significant in the plasmacautery group, this did not affect hospital stay and the starting of arm exercises.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…When the complications occurring in the patients in the present study were examined, it was observed that there were complications at the rate of 4.7% in all patients, and there was no statistical difference among the groups in terms of the prevalence of complications. In previous studies in the literature in which infiltration was performed, Steven et al [9] reported complications at the rate of 14%, Kaplan et al [2] reported complications at the rate of 4%, DeBono et al [5] reported complications at the rate of 12.5%, Mandrekas et al [10] reported complications at the rate of 5.7% in their studies. These results indicate that increasing the adrenaline level in the tissue by increasing the amount of the fluid infiltrated does not increase the rates of complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%