“…While numerous large studies regarding outpatient percutaneous coronary intervention demonstrated the safety and feasibility of this method [11][12][13], the large studies in the field of interventional radiology are less pronounced. Although different studies have attempted to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of outpatient percutaneous revascularization in patients with PAD [7,9,[14][15][16][17], the majority of studies have been focused on highly selected patients such as excluding the patients with critical limb ischemia or previous lower limb vascular surgery. However, what was revealed was that in almost every situation, complications occur during the procedure or during the 6 hours observation period, and therefore the outpatient approach will not alter the outcomes [8,9,16,18].…”