2016
DOI: 10.7305/automatika.2017.12.1485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Output Feedback Look-ahead Position Control of Electrically Driven Fast Surface Vessels

Abstract: Original scienti c paperRobust tracking control is of great importance for the surface vessels applications. This paper addresses the design of a trajectory tracking controller for fast underactuated ships in the presence of model uncertainties without velocity measurements in the yaw and surge directions. An observer-based trajectory tracking controller is proposed for the fast underactuated ship model. Then, the dynamic surface control approach is effectively exploited to propose a tracking controller consid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To illustrate the effectiveness of addressing the rudder constraints and optimization via the proposed MPC algorithm, we compare the designed MPC controller with the PD controller proposed in Li et al 27 and the sliding mode method (SMC: the sliding surface is s = ψe + 0.1 tanh (0.12ψ e ) and ṡ = −0.1s). The desired waypoint: P 1 (0, 0), P 2 (4000, 0), P 3 (7000, 3000), P 4 (10,000, 3000), P 5 (12,000, 1500), and P 6 (13,500,1500). The initial states: u = 7.2 m/s, v = 0, r = 0, ψ = 0, (x 0 , y 0 ) = (0, −100 m).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To illustrate the effectiveness of addressing the rudder constraints and optimization via the proposed MPC algorithm, we compare the designed MPC controller with the PD controller proposed in Li et al 27 and the sliding mode method (SMC: the sliding surface is s = ψe + 0.1 tanh (0.12ψ e ) and ṡ = −0.1s). The desired waypoint: P 1 (0, 0), P 2 (4000, 0), P 3 (7000, 3000), P 4 (10,000, 3000), P 5 (12,000, 1500), and P 6 (13,500,1500). The initial states: u = 7.2 m/s, v = 0, r = 0, ψ = 0, (x 0 , y 0 ) = (0, −100 m).…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Norrbin model as a prediction model, the system state is discretized and predicted based on the Euler iterative method as follows. We use formula (13) to discrete and predict the system states.…”
Section: Model Predictive Control Methods For Heading Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature [20] proposed an adaptive backstepping controller which combines the prescribed performance function with the disturbance observer to solve the problem of tracking control under the condition of time-varying disturbances and input saturation. For the case of model uncertainty, an observer based trajectory tracking controller is proposed in [21]. Qu et al designed a backstepping controller based on estimator, which can provide accurate estimation of disturbance and uncertainty [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sun et al proposed a robust adaptive trajectory tracking algorithm based on proportional integral sliding mode control and backstepping technology to improve the robustness of control system under model uncertainties and environmental disturbances [23]. It can be seen from above literatures that the current research on ship motion control mainly focuses on solving the model parameters uncertainty [13], [14], [16]- [19], [21]- [23], environmental disturbances [13], [14], [19], [20], [23] and input saturation [13], [14], [16], [18], [20]. In this paper, a novel virtual control law can not only avoid the singularity of error, but also avoid the problem of input saturation when the error is large.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%